Escola Politécnica da Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP vs State College of Technology - FATEC vs Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas - FMU vs Faculdade Santa Marcelina - FASM vs Ironhack

Side-by-side comparison from 15 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Faculdade Santa Marcelina - FASM (5.00)
Escola Politécnica da Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP: wins 0/6 categories
State College of Technology - FATEC: wins 3/6 categories
Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas - FMU: wins 0/6 categories
Faculdade Santa Marcelina - FASM: wins 0/6 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/6 categories
Universidade Federal do ABC: wins 0/6 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Citizen-Centered Digital Health and Social Care
Best programme: Event Management
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.25
5.00
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
2.75
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.00
4.00
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.25
4.00
Win
3.33
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.67
3.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic foundation and knowledge transfer
  • +Supportive and engaging learning environment
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +Caring, genius professors
  • +High quality education
  • +High quality faculty and excellent teaching
  • +Convenient location and safety
  • +Scholarship and alumni discount programs
  • +World-class fashion education and facilities
  • +Practical application of ideas
  • +Recognition and international level of teaching
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Pervasive and overwhelming activism, particularly a strong left bias, stifles unbiased learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of practical learning opportunities and rescheduled experiences.
  • -Insufficient or outdated facilities impacting the educational experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shows a mixed performance across various metrics. Its strongest area is **Location**, achieving a high rating of 4.25. In contrast, **Accommodation** stands out as the weakest point, with a score of 2.67. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life are moderate at 3, while Internationality also falls below average at 2.75. The overall **Value** is rated a respectable 3.25.

This institution boasts an impressive score for its professors, location, and international student experience, all receiving a perfect 5. Student life and facilities are also strong with 4-star ratings. The weakest area identified is accommodation, scoring 3 stars. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering, with particular strengths in academic quality and its global appeal.

This institution garners solid scores in several key aspects. Its location is a standout strength, while facilities and professors also receive favorable ratings. Student life and value for money are areas with room for improvement. Accommodation and internationality are the weakest points, suggesting opportunities for enhancement in these domains.

This university presents a uniform performance across all evaluated aspects, with no discernible strengths or weaknesses. All categories, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, received identical ratings. This suggests a consistent, albeit undeveloped, offering in every surveyed area.

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews show approximately 74% positive feedback, praising knowledgeable professors and a supportive environment. However, about 16.7% of reviews mention concerns like activism affecting learning.

With an average rating of 4/5, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise good professors who care about them and their exceptional knowledge. There are no negative reviews.

University feedback is mixed, with a ~25% of reviews expressing dissatisfaction. Positive feedback highlights respected faculty and good facilities, while negative comments focus on a lack of rescheduled lab classes and field trips.

The sole review is highly positive, awarding 5 stars. This feedback highlights the college's excellent facilities and international-level fashion education, strongly recommending it. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
50%
25%
100%
50%
0%
0%
4★
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
33%
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
17%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close