Escola Politécnica da Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP vs Instituto Federal de Sao Paulo - IFSP vs Ironhack vs Centro Universitário São Camilo vs Universidade de Ribeirão Preto

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Escola Politécnica da Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP: wins 0/3 categories
Instituto Federal de Sao Paulo - IFSP: wins 0/3 categories
Ironhack: wins 1/3 categories
Centro Universitário São Camilo: wins 0/3 categories
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto: wins 0/3 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/3 categories
São Judas Tadeu University: wins 2/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Citizen-Centered Digital Health and Social Care
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: School of Health Sciences/Medicine
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Advertising and Public Relations + Audiovisual Communication
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Location
4.25
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Professors
3.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
2.75
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
3.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Value
3.25
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
2.67
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic foundation and knowledge transfer
  • +Supportive and engaging learning environment
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Strong healthcare focus, excellent professors, and practical learning opportunities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and welcoming environment for international students
  • +High-quality teaching and accessible information
  • +Broadening of perspectives beyond career choice
Cons
  • -Pervasive and overwhelming activism, particularly a strong left bias, stifles unbiased learning.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Outdated facilities & technology
  • -Lack of engaging teaching methods

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of engagement in curriculum and teaching methods is a concern.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shows a mixed performance across various metrics. Its strongest area is **Location**, achieving a high rating of 4.25. In contrast, **Accommodation** stands out as the weakest point, with a score of 2.67. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life are moderate at 3, while Internationality also falls below average at 2.75. The overall **Value** is rated a respectable 3.25.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly excelling in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Student Life**, all receiving perfect scores. Facilities and accommodation are also well-regarded. The university's **Internationality** is its least developed aspect, scoring a moderate three. Overall, the university offers a compelling experience with its robust academic and social offerings.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With top marks in professorial quality and internationality, this institution excels in these key areas. Students will find excellent facilities and great value for their investment. However, ratings for location, student life, and accommodation are more moderate, suggesting areas where improvements could enhance the overall student experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews show approximately 74% positive feedback, praising knowledgeable professors and a supportive environment. However, about 16.7% of reviews mention concerns like activism affecting learning.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights excellent professors, a strong curriculum, and great practical training opportunities, leading to a ~100% positive sentiment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Both reviews are highly positive, praising excellent professor support and student integration. University culture is described as a positive and accessible experience.

Rating distribution
5★
33%
0%
50%
100%
0%
0%
100%
4★
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close