Escola Politécnica da Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP vs Instituto Federal de Sao Paulo - IFSP vs Faculty of Technology and Administration Paulista - FIAP vs Foundation Christ Life University - FUNVIC vs Ironhack

Side-by-side comparison from 10 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Faculty of Technology and Administration Paulista - FIAP (5.00)
Escola Politécnica da Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP: wins 2/7 categories
Instituto Federal de Sao Paulo - IFSP: wins 0/7 categories
Faculty of Technology and Administration Paulista - FIAP: wins 0/7 categories
Foundation Christ Life University - FUNVIC: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 5/7 categories
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto: wins 0/7 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Citizen-Centered Digital Health and Social Care
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.40
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.40
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
2.80
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.60
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic foundation and knowledgeable professors
  • +Supportive and welcoming community with engaging learning
  • +Excellent campus resources and student life

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent professors and engaging courses
  • +High quality programming education
  • +Recognized as a top university

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Pervasive, politically charged atmosphere disrupts academic focus.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency create dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university excels in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.4. Student life and value are also strong points, with scores of 3.5 and 3.6 respectively. Conversely, the university's **internationality** is its weakest area, scoring a lower 2.8. Facilities and accommodation also received moderate scores, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.

Nothing to show

Across all evaluated aspects, this institution received a uniform rating of zero. This suggests a consistent lack of perceived strength in areas such as facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. With no areas standing out as particularly positive or negative, the university presents a uniform performance across all surveyed categories.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most feedback is positive (~57%), highlighting a supportive environment and knowledgeable professors. A small portion of reviews (~14%) expresses concerns about activism. The average rating is 3.71/5.

Nothing to show

The sole reviewer rated FIAP 5/5 stars, highlighting excellent professors, students, and courses. This single positive review indicates a very favorable student experience, with no negative feedback reported.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
29%
0%
100%
0%
50%
0%
0%
4★
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close