Escola Politécnica da Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP vs Fundação Armando Álvares Penteado - FAAP vs Ironhack vs Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas - PUC vs Ecole Intuit Lab

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul (4.00)
Escola Politécnica da Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP: wins 0/5 categories
Fundação Armando Álvares Penteado - FAAP: wins 0/5 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/5 categories
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas - PUC: wins 0/5 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/5 categories
Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul: wins 1/5 categories
Federal University of Goias - UFG: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Citizen-Centered Digital Health and Social Care
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: 2D Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
1.00
Location
4.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
3.00
Professors
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
3.00
Internationality
2.75
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Student life
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
2.00
Value
3.25
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
2.67
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic foundation and knowledge transfer
  • +Supportive and engaging learning environment
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Reliable and competent academic support
  • +Affordable tuition fees

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Pervasive and overwhelming activism, particularly a strong left bias, stifles unbiased learning.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Poor administrative and management support leads to student frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum fail to engage or adequately prepare students.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shows a mixed performance across various metrics. Its strongest area is **Location**, achieving a high rating of 4.25. In contrast, **Accommodation** stands out as the weakest point, with a score of 2.67. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life are moderate at 3, while Internationality also falls below average at 2.75. The overall **Value** is rated a respectable 3.25.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its academic environment and student experience. Professors and student life both garnered top marks at 4.5, matched by an excellent location also rated 4.5. While facilities are solid at 3.5, internationality stands out as the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3. Accommodations and value are also favorably rated at 4.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews show approximately 74% positive feedback, praising knowledgeable professors and a supportive environment. However, about 16.7% of reviews mention concerns like activism affecting learning.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight a reliable academic support system and affordable tuition fees.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
0%
50%
0%
0%
50%
0%
4★
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
100%
2★
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close