London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Middlesex University - MDX vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Bloomsbury Institute London vs London Academy of Trading - LAT

Side-by-side comparison from 516 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 0/5 categories
Middlesex University - MDX: wins 0/5 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 0/5 categories
Bloomsbury Institute London: wins 0/5 categories
London Academy of Trading - LAT: wins 5/5 categories
London School of Design & Marketing - LSDM: wins 0/5 categories
CIM The Chartered Institute of Marketing: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
163 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
London, The United Kingdom
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Science
London, The United Kingdom
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Advanced Trading Course
Best programme: Marketing
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.25
4.44
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.78
4.26
4.75
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.26
4.27
4.76
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.80
4.25
4.62
4.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Student life
3.65
4.20
4.58
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.05
4.08
4.52
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.80
3.78
4.35
4.50
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Supportive, passionate, and approachable staff.
  • +Practical, relevant courses with real-world application.
  • +Positive, friendly campus atmosphere and strong sense of community.
  • +Supportive and approachable teachers
  • +Excellent student support services
  • +Convenient campus location and facilities
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Strong focus on practical and real-world application
  • +Welcoming and sociable student environment
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable tutors
  • +Engaging daily webinars with market analysis
  • +Improved trading profitability and understanding
  • +Engaging and effective learning platforms
  • +Up-to-date and high-quality course content
  • +Practical application through simulators

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
  • -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
  • -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and unengaging.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
  • -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common source of dissatisfaction.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are recurring themes.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.
  • -Administrative & management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and guidance leaves students feeling unsupported.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.

This university demonstrates a strong performance across most surveyed aspects, with professors, internationality, location, and facilities all receiving high marks, averaging above 4.2. Student life and value also score well. The weakest area, however, is accommodation, which stands at a notably lower rating.

This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.

This institution garners impressive scores, particularly in **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Value**, all receiving 4.5 stars. Its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality** also score well with a solid 4 stars. The university demonstrates excellence in student experience and practical aspects, with areas of strong student support and campus amenities.

Across numerous metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all garnered perfect scores, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. The sole area falling slightly short, though still very strong, is accommodation at 4.5 stars, suggesting a minor area for potential enhancement compared to its otherwise flawless performance.

Exceptional internationality marks this institution's highest score. Professors also receive strong commendation, indicating a positive academic experience. Conversely, the university significantly underperforms in facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, suggesting these areas require substantial improvement. Value for money is rated positively, reflecting a good return for students despite the noted weaknesses.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.

With ~89% positive reviews and an average 4.25/5 rating, students highlight a friendly campus vibe, engaging events, and supportive, knowledgeable staff. Some mention practical, industry-relevant courses and good group project opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.

All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.

Both reviews are highly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 average. Students praised supportive and knowledgeable lecturers, a strong focus on employability, and a welcoming, friendly atmosphere with sociable students.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Key highlights include excellent tutors, engaging daily webinars, and improved trading profitability. Students appreciated the supportive learning environment that clarified market understanding.

The single review highlights a simple, effective learning platform with up-to-date, high-quality marketing content. Students appreciate the marketing simulator for practical application, resulting in a strong 4/5 average rating.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
34%
36%
76%
100%
100%
0%
0%
4★
44%
53%
24%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
18%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

teachers

most teachers are very patient when helping and explaining to student with questions, the time table planning is not great, responsible team is only accepting online request which the reply was always unable to make changes(except health related issues )

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close