London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs City St George’s, University of London - City vs Middlesex University - MDX vs Birkbeck University of London vs Royal Docks Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 622 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Excellent course content and knowledgeable staff
- +Ideal city centre location with good transport links
- +Strong employability support and internship opportunities
- +Practical, relevant, and industry-standard course content
- +Passionate, supportive, and approachable lecturers
- +Diverse, inclusive, and vibrant campus community
- +Supportive and caring staff communication
- +Engaging and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Diverse and motivated student community
Nothing to show
- +Excellent lecturers and strong academic programmes.
- +Amazing staff support and welcoming environment.
- +Encouragement to further education and personal development.
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Poor teaching quality and unhelpful lectures lead to academic underperformance.
- -The university prioritizes profit over student education and career preparation.
- -The curriculum and research standards are weak, failing to prepare students for advanced studies or careers.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often criticized as being ineffective.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative staff.
- -Overcrowded and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support for students.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling ignored.
Nothing to show
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
This institution garners excellent marks, particularly in **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.35. Student Life and Professor quality also received strong ratings, exceeding 4.17 and 4.22 respectively. While Location and Value are also positive, the **Accomodation** category presents the lowest score at 3.94, indicating an area for potential improvement.
Surveyed metrics indicate a generally positive university experience. Professors and Internationality received the highest marks, both above 4.2. Facilities and Student Life also scored well, exceeding 4.1. Location and Value were rated respectably around 4.0. The weakest area, Accommodation, scored significantly lower at 3.6.
Academic and faculty excellence stand out, with professors receiving a near-perfect score. Location also scores highly, reflecting a desirable setting. However, student life and value represent the areas with the most room for improvement. Facilities and internationality are rated favorably, contributing to a generally positive assessment.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in its teaching quality, vibrant student life, prime location, and strong international focus, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, accommodation is a significant area for improvement, rated at zero. Facilities and overall value are also highly regarded, indicating a generally positive student experience.
Nothing to show
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
With an average rating of 4.32/5, ~94% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable staff, good course content, and ideal city centre locations. ~2% of feedback expressed concerns about teaching quality and value.
With a 4.24 average rating from 161 reviews, ~89% of feedback is positive. Students praise practical course content, passionate lecturers, and a good campus vibe. No negative reviews were recorded.
With a 4.26/5 average rating from 35 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong communication, caring and approachable staff, and knowledgeable, engaging lecturers. Small class sizes foster personalized attention.
Nothing to show
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 rating. The student praised excellent lecturers and exceptional support from staff.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
My time at City University London was truly transformative. The university's vibrant community and diverse extracurricular activities allowed me to forge lifelong friendships and professional connections that extend beyond the classroom. I was impressed by the university's commitment to academic rigor, character development, and personal growth, which created an ideal environment for me to reach my full potential. The research-driven and industry-relevant curriculum provided me with a solid foundation in international business, while the dedicated faculty and staff offered invaluable guidance and support. I feel grateful for the well-rounded education and holistic experience that City University London offered, preparing me for success in my career and beyond.
most teachers are very patient when helping and explaining to student with questions, the time table planning is not great, responsible team is only accepting online request which the reply was always unable to make changes(except health related issues )
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
