London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Warwick vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Newcastle University vs Birkbeck University of London
Side-by-side comparison from 817 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Engaging academic environment with knowledgeable, supportive faculty.
- +Diverse extracurriculars and vibrant campus life with extensive clubs and societies.
- +State-of-the-art facilities enhancing the learning experience.
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Strong academic programs with practical application
- +Supportive professors and learning environment
- +Excellent career services and preparation for the workforce
- +Supportive and caring staff communication
- +Engaging and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Diverse and motivated student community
- +Welcoming environment & community building
- +Strong academic programs & practical learning
- +Excellent student support & career guidance
- +Strong academic programs with real-world application
- +Passionate and supportive professors
- +Practical skill development and well-structured curriculum
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Insufficient and ineffective mental health support is a major concern.
- -Theoretical studies disconnect from real-world applications hinder learning.
- -Depressing campus environment and poor student life contribute to misery.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Lack of academic and personal support, especially at the master's level, feels like a money grab.
- -Minimal resources and effort from academic support teams are disappointing.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative staff.
- -Overcrowded and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support for students.
- -Program structure is poorly designed and lacks practical application.
- -Courses are irrelevant and do not prepare students for job markets.
- -Lack of career support and teaching staff unsupportive.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Outdated facilities & poor technology
- -Lack of career support & guidance
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
This university garners impressive scores in several key areas, notably excelling in **Internationality** with a rating of 4.49 and **Facilities** at 4.38. Professors also receive strong marks (4.34). The lowest rated aspect is **Location**, coming in at 3.79. Overall, student life (4.29), accommodation (4.09), and value (4.21) are all well-regarded, indicating a generally positive experience for students.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
Analyzing university ratings reveals strengths in location, student life, and facilities. These areas received the highest scores, indicating a well-rounded student experience. Conversely, value for money emerged as the weakest point, though still at a respectable level. Other factors like professors, accommodation, and internationality also scored well, contributing to an overall positive assessment.
Academic and faculty excellence stand out, with professors receiving a near-perfect score. Location also scores highly, reflecting a desirable setting. However, student life and value represent the areas with the most room for improvement. Facilities and internationality are rated favorably, contributing to a generally positive assessment.
This university garners particularly strong scores in **Location** (4.55) and **Student Life** (4.48), indicating positive student experiences in these aspects. Facilities also receive a high mark at 4.42. The **Accommodation** category shows the lowest rating at 4.02, suggesting this is an area that could be improved, though it remains a respectable score overall. Internationality, Professors, and Value are all rated positively in the low to mid-4s.
This university garners strong marks across multiple facets. Its strongest areas are Location and Student Life, both scoring an impressive 4.53. Facilities and Internationality also perform very well, each at 4.47. On the other hand, Accomodation and Value received slightly lower, though still solid, scores of 4.12 and 4.18 respectively. Professors are rated highly at 4.24, rounding out a generally positive assessment.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
With an average rating of 4.38/5, ~94% of reviews are positive. Students highlight knowledgeable lecturers, excellent facilities, and a strong work-play balance with numerous clubs. A small percentage of negative feedback mentioned theoretical studies and mental health support concerns.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With a 4.38/5 average from 133 reviews, ~92% of feedback is positive, highlighting academic quality, supportive professors, and a good campus environment. A single negative review mentioned poor masters-level support.
With a 4.26/5 average rating from 35 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong communication, caring and approachable staff, and knowledgeable, engaging lecturers. Small class sizes foster personalized attention.
The university receives high praise (~79%) for its welcoming atmosphere, hands-on learning, and career support. A small portion of feedback (~5.5%) mentions issues with program structure and job prospects.
Most reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.35/5. Students praise academic excellence, real-world application, passionate professors, and well-structured, practical programs. No negative feedback was reported.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
The University's laboratory is equipped with all the essential resources for effective learning and practical training. I have been fortunate to work with equipment that I was not previously familiar with and have received exceptional supervision on utilizing and managing these tools. This experience has been pivotal in advancing my professional development, and I am confident that I will be well-equipped to enter the workforce upon completing my studies.
Nothing to show
The facilities of the school of computing are great - very modern building, newest equipment, campus located in the city centre (most likely you don’t need to commute there by metro or a bus). One major thing however that is lacking is the organisation. Being a third-year student I still have the same feeling - the program is written very chaotically. In 2019 there was that revolution of the programme (to keep learning the newest technology) to which lectures and demonstrators still feel a bit unadapted. I hope this will get better in the next year or two years. However, after that time, the taught technology may change again (which is good) and it will take another couple of years for the lecturers to be fluent in what they teaching (which is not good).
Nothing to show
Overall, my time at Northumbria was ok. Not great just ok. My time was influenced by the COVID outbreak and so my final year was all online. Through my second and final year there was a lack of support from tutors. Not only that I had extenuating circumstances which were ignored when appealing my final grade.
Reading about the school, I was impressed by the attention they claim to give the students, their ranking amongst top universities and the business school facilitators plus the partnering bodies. I was also intrigued by the data lab and how their research are always towards the betterment of society and humanity. I was not shocked to resume school and see all these, first hand; I am proud to be part of NUBS story! The classrooms are standard and environmentally friendly, the campus is aesthetically beautiful and has a story to tell. The reception is almost like a friendly work station and I love how my desk replicates an office setting making me feel at home and not like a child resuming school. I resumed late and had my supervisors and students helping me catch up with a friendly team that I could reach out to without fear or remorse. It sure is a great place to school and work.
