Mary Immaculate College - MIC vs University of Limerick - UL vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Kemmy Business School - KBS
Side-by-side comparison from 124 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Close-knit community and personal lecturer relationships
- +Strong sense of togetherness and unity among students
- +Excellent teaching programs and student support
- +Practical skills and career preparation
- +Supportive and friendly academic staff and community
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +Expert faculty and supportive environment
- +Modern facilities and accommodation
- +Supportive guidance throughout the student journey
- +Practical, skill-focused education with industry-experienced professors
- +Affordable programs and welcoming community atmosphere
- +Supportive and accessible faculty
- +Well-structured and accommodating courses
- +Welcoming and convenient campus environment
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and responsiveness from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of career guidance and irrelevant research suggestions from faculty.
- -Poor quality of education and facilities not worth the cost.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication and transparency are lacking from leadership.
- -Lack of essential university facilities and student support services
- -Poor teaching quality and insufficient practical application
- -Inadequate building maintenance and uncomfortable conditions
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Ineffective administrative and management practices cause frustration.
- -Lack of student support and career services is a significant concern.
This institution shows a stark contrast in its ratings. It excels significantly in **Professors** and **Value**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its **Internationality** is a clear weak point, scoring only one. Facilities, Location, and Student Life also received low marks, indicating areas for considerable improvement. Accommodations sit in the middle with a moderate rating.
Analysis of university ratings reveals a generally positive reception. The strongest area is **Value** (4.32), closely followed by **Professors** (4.28) and **Student Life** (4.23). **Accommodations** stand out as the weakest point, receiving the lowest rating at 3.94. Other categories like Facilities and Internationality also scored well above average.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates a consistent and strong performance. Each aspect, from facilities and professors to student life and internationality, has earned a rating of 4. The university excels uniformly, with no single area standing out significantly above others, nor any area identified as a weakness. Its balanced approach suggests a well-rounded educational experience.
Academic and international aspects of the university are highly praised, with Professors and Internationality both receiving a strong 4.29 rating. Location also scores well at 4.17. The university's weakest area is Accomodation, which received a lower score of 2.88. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a moderate range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its strengths.
This university presents a generally positive profile, with particularly strong ratings for its professors at 4.5. Other highly-rated aspects include facilities, student life, accommodation, and internationality, all scoring a solid 4. The location is the weakest area, receiving a 3.5 rating, though overall value is also rated favorably at 4.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~75%), highlighting a strong sense of community, close lecturer-student relationships, and excellent teaching. Some mention the college's compact size and limited on-site facilities.
With an average rating of 4.24/5, approximately 99% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent facilities, practical skills, and a vibrant learning atmosphere. A single negative review mentioned concerns about career prospects and faculty motivation.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews praise the vibrant academic community, state-of-the-art amenities, and expert faculty. ~100% of feedback is positive, with no negative reviews recorded.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive guidance, practical learning, and friendly staff. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions a lack of facilities and career support.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, ~0% negative feedback indicates a highly positive student experience. Students praise the welcoming atmosphere, easy navigation of classes and campus, and friendly student-friendly location. Responsiveness of staff and well-structured courses are also highlighted.
Nothing to show
I am currently studying a Masters in International Entrepreneurship Management this programme develops entrepreneurial creativity, awareness and specialist knowledge to help establish, manage and grow innovative new ventures across a variety of industry settings, incorporating a range of in-company projects to give ‘real world’ experience. Participants explore their own entrepreneurial potential and prepare an investor-ready business plan. I have always wanted to start my own business and this programme equipped me with the tools and skills to do this. Throughout the programme, we were able to work with real-life businesses and consult for them on a regular basis. For example in a module called international business consulting we worked for one of the biggest PPE distributors in the EU. We developed a market entry strategy for the company Irema and outlined how they could advance into the US market. Furthermore, for the final year project, we had to work with a small enterprise and establish a two-year commercialisation plan for them. This was really great fun and gave a practical experience that you wouldn’t be able to get in any other programme.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
