IÉSEG School of Management vs Rennes School of Business vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs ESSCA School of Management vs EMLV Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 325 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Forward College (4.90)
IÉSEG School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
Rennes School of Business: wins 0/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
EMLV Business School: wins 1/7 categories
Forward College: wins 6/7 categories
Ecole des Ponts Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Management
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
Best programme: International Business
Best programme: International Business
Paris, France
4.90
Top
Read more reviews
16 reviews
×
Best programme: Politics and International Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
4.09
4.12
4.00
3.58
4.78
Win
4.47
Not rated
Location
4.29
4.24
3.57
4.08
4.88
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.28
4.29
4.00
4.00
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.55
4.32
4.14
4.00
4.11
4.75
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.25
4.41
3.71
4.17
4.11
4.73
Win
Not rated
Value
4.31
4.18
4.00
3.67
4.11
4.63
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.78
3.85
3.50
3.25
4.00
4.33
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and practical learning experiences
  • +Strong international community and global opportunities
  • +Supportive professors and active student associations
  • +Practical, real-world learning and experienced faculty
  • +Diverse and international student and faculty community
  • +Welcoming and supportive learning environment
  • +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
  • +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
  • +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
  • +Practical, experiential learning with real-world application.
  • +Strong international focus, diversity, and global opportunities.
  • +Supportive faculty and high-quality teaching.
  • +Career-focused programs and practical learning opportunities
  • +Diverse and inclusive multicultural environment
  • +Modern facilities and resources
  • +Engaging learning environment with interactive methods
  • +Diverse and international student community
  • +Unique multi-city European study experience

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
  • -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
  • -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
  • -Poor English communication from staff and professors is a major frustration.
  • -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
  • -Expensive tuition for irrelevant courses and unqualified instructors.
  • -Lack of student motivation and engagement in academics.
  • -Administrative and management issues negatively impact student experiences.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
  • -Poor curriculum design and delivery lead to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a concern.
  • -Lack of transparency and communication is prevalent.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.

Assessing the university's performance reveals a generally positive reception from students. Student life stands out as the strongest area, alongside internationality and professors, all receiving high marks. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest point, scoring notably lower than other aspects. Other categories like facilities, location, and value also garnered solid, above-average ratings.

This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.

This institution garners particularly high marks for Student Life, averaging over 4.16, with Location also scoring well at 4.08. Professors and Internationality are also rated positively at a solid 4.0. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, receiving a 3.25 rating, while Facilities and Value are mid-range.

With excellent marks in several key areas, this institution shines particularly brightly in its facilities, earning a near-perfect score. The location also receives very high praise. Conversely, accommodation presents the lowest-rated aspect, while student life, internationality, and value for money are rated moderately. Professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores compared to the top categories.

This university garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in its **professors and location**, both achieving perfect scores. Student life and internationality also stand out with scores above 4.7. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **facilities and accommodation**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded positive student experience with high marks across most aspects.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.

With ~97% positive feedback, students praise teaching methods, practical learning, global faculty, and strong business ties. A small fraction of reviews noted challenges for international students regarding language and administrative support.

Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.

Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising practical and international teaching, supportive staff, and a great environment. One review (around 8%) expressed dissatisfaction with course relevance and teaching quality.

University reviews are largely positive (~89%), highlighting career-oriented programs, modern facilities, and a multicultural environment. A small portion of feedback (~11%) mentions poor administration and management of specific programs.

Students highly praise the interactive learning, international community, and opportunities for academic and personal growth. There are no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
49%
44%
43%
25%
33%
94%
0%
4★
44%
56%
29%
42%
44%
6%
0%
3★
9%
0%
14%
25%
11%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
8%
11%
0%
0%
1★
0%
3%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A formative and enriching experience

IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.

Exemplary institution

The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.

Nothing to show

Engaging

ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.

Poor administration

We were promised good internship programs, however we are left to fend for ourselves where we have to find everything on our own with little to no guidance from the bigger authorities. A little disappointing

Great modern university approach

I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close