London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Northampton vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Cardiff Business School vs Edge Hill Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 403 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 0/3 categories
University of Northampton: wins 0/3 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 0/3 categories
Cardiff Business School: wins 0/3 categories
Edge Hill Business School: wins 1/3 categories
London Academy of Trading - LAT: wins 2/3 categories
Pearson College London: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Northampton, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
25 reviews
×
Best programme: MBA
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Cardiff, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
23 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing
Lancashire, The United Kingdom
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Business
London, The United Kingdom
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Advanced Trading Course
London, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.36
4.44
4.43
5.00
5.00
4.50
Location
4.78
4.00
4.75
4.43
4.00
5.00
Win
4.75
Professors
4.26
4.00
4.76
4.35
5.00
5.00
4.25
Internationality
4.80
3.92
4.62
4.04
5.00
5.00
3.75
Student life
3.65
3.68
4.58
4.38
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Value
4.05
4.00
4.52
4.26
5.00
5.00
4.25
Accommodation
3.80
3.65
4.35
4.57
5.00
Win
4.50
3.75
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Excellent learning resources and facilities
  • +Supportive staff and student community
  • +Well-organized programs and modules
  • +Supportive and approachable teachers
  • +Excellent student support services
  • +Convenient campus location and facilities
  • +Excellent, supportive lecturers and creative teaching methods.
  • +Strong student support services and good career prospects.
  • +Interesting course content and a good learning experience.
  • +excellent student support
  • +engaging remote learning
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable tutors
  • +Engaging daily webinars with market analysis
  • +Improved trading profitability and understanding
  • +UK qualifications, global presence
  • +Great teaching, tutors, and modules
  • +Accommodating staff and extracurricular opportunities
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
  • -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
  • -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
  • -Lack of adequate support and guidance, particularly for placements.
  • -Poor quality of teaching and course delivery, especially when shifted online.
  • -Rushed and confusing module content necessitating excessive independent learning.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
  • -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
  • -Administrative & management issues created chaos and imbalance.
  • -Frustration with administrative and management issues.
  • -Concerns about outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Dissatisfaction with course content and teaching quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.

This institution's survey results indicate exceptional strength in its **facilities**, receiving the highest score. **Professors** and **location** are also rated well. Conversely, **student life** and **accommodation** received the lowest marks. Other areas like **internationality** and **value** scored solidly. Overall, the university presents a positive picture, particularly in its physical resources and academic staff.

This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.

Overall, this institution garners positive evaluations. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Location, both receiving a rating of 4.43. Accommodations also score well at 4.38. Student Life is the weakest area surveyed, with a rating of 4.00, followed closely by Internationality at 4.04. Professors and Value also received solid scores, indicating a well-rounded university experience.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. Student life and location are also highly rated, scoring a respectable 4 out of 5. The university's weakest areas, though still very positive, are student life and location, suggesting minor room for improvement in these aspects while excelling elsewhere.

Across numerous metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all garnered perfect scores, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. The sole area falling slightly short, though still very strong, is accommodation at 4.5 stars, suggesting a minor area for potential enhancement compared to its otherwise flawless performance.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Location**, receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75, and its **Facilities**, rated at 4.5. Areas for potential improvement are **Accommodations** and **Internationality**, both scoring 3.75. Other categories like Professors, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid range, indicating a generally positive university experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.

Most reviews (approximately 84%) are positive, highlighting great modules, organised programmes, renewed campus facilities, and friendly colleagues. A small minority (about 8%) expressed concerns about rushed teaching and lack of support.

All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.

With a ~96% positive sentiment, students praise remarkable lecturers, supportive services, and engaging course material. One negative review noted poor overall management and inconsistent workload.

The sole review is highly positive (100%), with a 5/5 average rating. The feedback highlights excellent support during challenging times and engaging remote learning resources.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Key highlights include excellent tutors, engaging daily webinars, and improved trading profitability. Students appreciated the supportive learning environment that clarified market understanding.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent teaching, supportive staff, and diverse educational perspectives. Some minor feedback notes limited cafeteria food options.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
36%
76%
52%
100%
100%
75%
4★
44%
48%
24%
35%
0%
0%
0%
3★
18%
8%
0%
9%
0%
0%
25%
2★
2%
4%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Too new?

When I attended Pearson, it was relatively new and small. This meant that you could build good relationships with staff and tutors and be able to access any help you needed easily. However, despite how new the business school was, any criticism such as the course structure was unwelcome and always argued with. As each year passed the number of new students in each year increased significantly which caused problems with access to both tutors and quiet study spaces as they only had 2 floors and a basement which was shared with Pearson staff. As for the tutors, I received lectures and seminars from some amazing people who were extremely knowledgeable in accounting and made it so much easier to understand. However, being such a new school they hired tutors who they eventually found out - too late might I add - did not fit the role. Nothing was put in place to help rectify the fact that students had received sub-par teaching. Before attending Pearson College, they bragged about their business workshops and connections. Throughout my time at Pearson, I soon discovered that these workshops were few and far between but more importantly, they were often unrelated to my course or fully booked. One highlight is the fact that they added an office space for a start-up business to work and students were able to gain some experience working with them. Moving onto the facilities of the college, there's really not much to talk about. There's limited space at the campus, especially with the growing number of students. There used to be quiet study rooms for students but they were then taken and used as offices for the growing number of staff. Understandably they need office space but it's very hard to study without quiet spaces such as a library. Lastly, the degrees are validated by the University of Kent which although it gives you faith in the programme you are studying, you are faced with extended wait times for results compared to other universities which is especially frustrating in your final year.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close