London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Leicester vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Glasgow Caledonian University vs Edge Hill Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 577 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +High-quality teaching and clear assessments
- +Student-friendly communication and valued feedback
- +Good value, safe environment and excellent facilities
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Welcoming and inclusive environment with supportive staff.
- +Strong focus on employability and industry-relevant programs.
- +Well-equipped campus with convenient city center location.
- +excellent student support
- +engaging remote learning
- +Supportive and knowledgeable tutors
- +Engaging daily webinars with market analysis
- +Improved trading profitability and understanding
- +Accessible resources and user-friendly website
- +Positive learning environment and supportive teachers
- +Strong professional development and career opportunities
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Inadequate time for exams, especially open-book ones.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Limited focus on practical skills and "hard facts."
- -Cumbersome administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and technology.
- -Frustration with administrative and management issues.
- -Concerns about outdated facilities and resources.
- -Dissatisfaction with course content and teaching quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency exacerbates problems.
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
Considering the provided ratings, student life and location stand out as particularly strong areas, both scoring above 4.3. The university also received high marks for its facilities and internationality. Conversely, accommodation represents the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Value for money and professor quality are rated reasonably well, falling within the 4.1 to 4.2 range.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
Considering the provided scores, this institution excels in its **location**, boasting the highest rating. Student life and internationality are also significant strengths. However, **accommodation** received the lowest score, indicating an area for improvement. Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance in most aspects, with location being a standout feature.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. Student life and location are also highly rated, scoring a respectable 4 out of 5. The university's weakest areas, though still very positive, are student life and location, suggesting minor room for improvement in these aspects while excelling elsewhere.
Across numerous metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all garnered perfect scores, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. The sole area falling slightly short, though still very strong, is accommodation at 4.5 stars, suggesting a minor area for potential enhancement compared to its otherwise flawless performance.
With outstanding scores in nearly every aspect, this institution excels in its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all receiving perfect marks. However, a significant area for improvement is evident in student life, which received the lowest possible rating, indicating a substantial deficit in this crucial category.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~83%), praising teaching quality, organization, and facilities. A small fraction (~1.2%) of feedback expresses concerns regarding exam timing and difficulty.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
With ~93% positive feedback from 139 reviews, students praise the welcoming atmosphere, strong employability focus, and helpful staff. A single negative review cited a lack of "hard facts" in the program.
The sole review is highly positive (100%), with a 5/5 average rating. The feedback highlights excellent support during challenging times and engaging remote learning resources.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Key highlights include excellent tutors, engaging daily webinars, and improved trading profitability. Students appreciated the supportive learning environment that clarified market understanding.
With an average rating of 5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university experience and CIMA's support, describing it as a dream come true.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
It was a dream come true, I wanted to become a CIMA member which I achieved in 2015, the thing I like their support very user friendly website, the thing I dislike is the Merger with AICPA, as it seems like for most members it is not a merger but a take over. All in all I am happy to be a member in this Esteem Management Accountancy body.
