London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Kingston University - KU vs Kingston Business School vs Istituto Marangoni vs Buckingham Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 412 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Marketable courses and high academic standards
- +Excellent, expert faculty with industry experience
- +Supportive, respectful, and flexible learning environment
- +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers, practical and relevant course content
- +Inclusive campus environment with many opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Strong support systems and useful resources for students
- +Supportive & engaged faculty
- +Academic growth & new learning opportunities
- +Prestigious location & student support
- +Global fashion hub and career opportunities
- +Inspiring teachers and valuable learning experiences
- +Small class sizes and individual attention.
- +Helpful tutors and support staff
- +Worthwhile and fun learning experience
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in programs.
- -High fees are not justified by the quality of education and support.
- -Limited social life and inadequate student support services.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts studies.
- -Disorganized student union and indifferent faculty are recurring problems.
- -Inconvenient course scheduling and unclear academic policies.
- -Insufficient and outdated facilities and resources.
- -Lack of engagement from faculty and limited career support.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are significant problems.
- -Inconsistent and poor administrative and management support.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective teaching and outdated curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities create a difficult learning environment.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or not current with industry standards.
Nothing to show
With a strong emphasis on **Internationality** (4.80) and **Location** (4.78), this institution presents a globally connected and well-situated environment. Professors also receive high marks (4.26). Conversely, **Student Life** (3.63) and **Accommodations** (3.79) are the areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, suggesting room for improvement in campus vibrancy and living arrangements.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value also received favorable scores. Student Life and Accomodation are areas where improvements could be beneficial, as they received the lowest ratings in the survey.
Across multiple aspects, the institution receives commendable feedback. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value are particularly strong areas, all scoring 4.25. Location and Accommodation are rated well at 4, with Internationality also receiving a solid 4 rating. The university demonstrates a consistent level of quality throughout these evaluated areas.
This institution shines particularly brightly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving excellent scores. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out as strong points. Conversely, the **Facilities** represent the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other aspects. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement but also solid performance.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for **Internationality**. Other strong points include **Professors**, **Location**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a respectable 4 out of 5. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** represent the weaker aspects, each scoring 3. **Value** also sits at a moderate 3, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This institution garners excellent scores for its location and a strong showing in professor quality and international student experience. However, areas such as facilities, student life, and accommodation received more moderate ratings, indicating potential for improvement in these aspects. Overall, it presents a compelling offering, particularly for those prioritizing geographical advantages and academic instruction.
Nothing to show
Most reviews (~74%) praise marketable courses, expert faculty, and excellent research opportunities. Very few (~3.4%) express concerns about teaching quality, grading consistency, and career services.
Kingston University receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~81% of 80 reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.19/5. Key strengths include knowledgeable lecturers, practical course content, and a supportive environment, though a small percentage (~2.5%) noted poor management and lack of resources.
All four reviews are positive, resulting in an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight supportive staff and professors, academic growth opportunities, and manageable workloads as key strengths.
With a 3.67 average rating, positive feedback (~33%) highlights fashion business opportunities and inspiring teachers. No negative reviews were provided.
With one review and an average of 4/5 stars, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. This single review highlights small class sizes and excellent student-teacher ratios, enabling individual support. There is no negative feedback to report.
The single review is positive, rating the university a 4/5. This feedback highlights worthwhile and fun experiences, with progress attributed to helpful tutors and support staff. Negative feedback is negligible.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
The course and it's syllabus can be super interesting and fun but most of the lecturers are trash. They show no enthusiasm to teach and deliver lectures as if they were eulogies. Which is a shame, I feel the only thing holding back KU is the lack of enthusiasm.
Nothing to show
I like a lot of it but I feel like the subject teaches us the same every time. There should be more diversity in our contents and make us work more in groups and do more exercises in class, in order words the classes should be more dynamic
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
