University of Calicut vs University of Caldas vs MEF Faculty - Nz vs Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA vs Capiz State University - CAPSU

Side-by-side comparison from 19 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Calicut: wins 1/6 categories
University of Caldas: wins 0/6 categories
MEF Faculty - Nz: wins 0/6 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/6 categories
Capiz State University - CAPSU: wins 2/6 categories
National University of Pharmacy - NUPH: wins 3/6 categories
Pasundan University - UNPAS: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Thenhipalam, India
4.50
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Management
Manizales, Colombia
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Belgrade, Serbia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Roxas City, Capiz, Philippines
4.30
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Physical Education
Best programme: Pharmacy
Best programme: Communication Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
4.09
Win
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.00
4.00
Location
4.40
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
5.00
Win
3.00
Professors
4.45
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.25
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.09
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.25
5.00
Win
4.00
Student life
4.27
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Value
4.18
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.75
Win
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.80
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.25
Win
4.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Wide range of courses and strong departments
  • +Beautiful campus and good location
  • +Quality education and access to higher learning

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated professors and quality education
  • +Supportive environment for skill development and holistic growth
  • +Preparation for real-world careers and leadership
  • +Passionate and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Strong foundational knowledge in pharmaceutical subjects
  • +Diverse and inclusive campus culture
  • +Rich learning environment fostering growth
  • +Vibrant community engagement
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
  • -Inefficient administrative and management processes cause frustration.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support hinders academic progress.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative burdens and inefficient management create frustration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution causes confusion and dissatisfaction.
  • -Excessive administrative bureaucracy and poor communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Lack of academic support and outdated curriculum.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of essential resources and academic support causes dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives high marks, particularly for its **Professors**, scoring an impressive 4.45. **Location** also stands out at 4.4. The university demonstrates solid performance in Student Life and Internationality, both around 4.09, and offers good Value at 4.18. **Accomodation** is the lowest rated category, coming in at 3.8.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates notable strengths in several areas, with exceptional marks for **Value** (4.75) and excellent scores for **Location** and **Student Life** (both 4.5). **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** also receive strong ratings (4.25). The **Facilities** category, while still respectable, represents the lowest score at 3.5.

Remarkably strong performance is evident in several key areas. The university excels with perfect scores in Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality. Facilities and Accommodation also receive excellent marks, both at a 4 out of 5. The sole area with a slightly lower rating, though still positive, is Value at 4.

This institution receives top marks for its excellent professors, reflecting a strong academic environment. While its location and accommodation received middling scores, most other aspects, including facilities, student life, internationality, and overall value, were rated highly. This suggests a well-rounded experience with particular strengths in teaching quality.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.55 average rating from 11 reviews, ~91% are positive. Students highlight strong programs, a wide course selection, and positive campus environments. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight dedicated professors, holistic development, and opportunities to hone skills. Some minor facility improvements are suggested.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with one review giving a perfect 5/5 rating. This feedback highlights comprehensive subject knowledge and passionate academics, particularly in pharmacognosy. There is no negative feedback to report.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This feedback strongly praises the university's embrace of cultural diversity and inclusivity, fostering a vibrant learning environment.

Rating distribution
5★
64%
0%
0%
0%
25%
100%
100%
4★
27%
0%
0%
0%
75%
0%
0%
3★
9%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close