Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST vs Ziauddin University - ZU vs Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine vs University of Okara vs Islamia University of Bahawalpur

Side-by-side comparison from 25 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST: wins 1/6 categories
Ziauddin University - ZU: wins 1/6 categories
Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine: wins 0/6 categories
University of Okara: wins 0/6 categories
Islamia University of Bahawalpur: wins 2/6 categories
Karachi School of Business & Leadership: wins 2/6 categories
TIPS College of Accountancy: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Dental Surgery
Karachi, Pakistan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: MBA
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.69
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
3.00
Not rated
Location
4.13
3.60
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.44
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
3.25
3.83
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.07
Win
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Value
3.75
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
2.63
2.67
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and qualified faculty providing engaging guidance.
  • +High-quality programs with a focus on student development.
  • +Inspiring atmosphere and excellent facilities.
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Modern and well-equipped facilities
  • +Practical learning and development opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and friendly faculty
  • +Positive and encouraging university environment
  • +Engaging and transformative teaching methods
  • +Opportunities for career and knowledge growth

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication are frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Limited career support and unclear future prospects cause concern.
  • -Unprofessional administration and some teachers.
  • -Unsatisfactory academic practices in specific departments.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of effective communication and clear expectations frustrate students.
  • -Overcrowded and understaffed classrooms are a consistent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication issues and a perceived lack of support from administration are frequently mentioned.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Academic and student life aspects generally shine, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks (4.44) and **Student Life** (4.07) and **Location** (4.13) also scoring well. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a clear area for improvement, indicated by the lowest rating (2.63). **Facilities** (3.69) and **Value** (3.75) fall in the mid-range, while **Internationality** (3.25) scores moderately.

This institution receives favorable marks for its **Facilities** (4) and **Professors** (4.17). Areas requiring improvement include **Accomodation** (2.67) and **Student Life** (3.5). Other aspects like **Location** (3.6), **Internationality** (3.83), and **Value** (3.67) fall within a moderate range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution scores exceptionally well in several key areas, with perfect ratings for both location and accommodation. Facilities and professors also receive high marks, indicating a strong academic and physical environment. Student life and value for money are solid, though internationality presents a relative weakness compared to other aspects.

This institution excels with perfect scores for its professors, location, and value, indicating a strong academic and external offering. Areas for potential improvement are facilities, student life, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving moderate ratings. Overall, the university presents a compelling proposition, particularly for those prioritizing teaching quality and affordability.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.06/5, approximately 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting friendly atmospheres, helpful teachers, and engaging classes. Negative feedback is minimal, representing about 0% of all feedback.

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews indicate around 83% positive feedback praising supportive faculty and good facilities. Some students, representing about 17%, noted average performance in specific departments and unprofessionalism from some staff.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Students express high satisfaction, with 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5. Recurring themes include a good university environment and supportive, friendly faculty who encourage learning.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being highly favorable. Students praise the transformative teaching style that makes theoretical knowledge engaging. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
31%
50%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
4★
44%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
25%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close