Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía vs Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO vs Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC vs Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito vs Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC

Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO: wins 3/7 categories
Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC: wins 2/7 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia - UNAD: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: BA (hons) Psychology
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.43
4.60
5.00
Win
4.20
4.33
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.57
Win
4.00
4.50
3.40
4.33
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
4.57
4.67
Win
4.50
4.60
4.40
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
4.29
4.67
Win
2.00
3.20
4.00
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
4.71
Win
4.20
4.50
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Value
Not rated
4.43
4.17
5.00
Win
4.40
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
4.71
Win
4.00
4.00
3.60
4.67
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +High-quality, experienced faculty
  • +Strong, well-structured programs with practical application
  • +Excellent academic training and professional growth opportunities
  • +High academic quality and standards
  • +Flexible study options and time management
  • +Committed and qualified professors
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong academic rigor and technical focus
  • +Pleasant campus environment
  • +Strong economics, law, and political science programs
  • +Excellent preparation for the labor market
  • +University prestige and history
  • +Supportive and caring staff offering detailed explanations.
  • +Emphasis on self-reliance and critical thinking in learning.
  • +Flexible online learning options with advanced technological resources.

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Disorganized and unhelpful administration.
  • -Outdated or insufficient facilities and resources.
  • -Lack of engaging or relevant curriculum.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and ineffective management.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and industry relevance is a common concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff creates confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Overall, this institution garners positive evaluations across numerous aspects. Student life and accommodation stand out as the strongest areas, achieving the highest scores. Conversely, internationality is rated slightly lower than other categories, representing the weakest performing metric. Facilities and value received comparable, solid ratings, while professor and location scores were also very strong.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.66. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are the areas with the lowest scores, at 4. These ratings suggest a well-regarded university with some room for improvement in specific logistical aspects.

This university scores exceptionally well in areas like Facilities and Value, both receiving a perfect 5. Professors, Location, and Student Life are also highly rated at 4.5. Accommodations are solid at 4. However, Internationality stands out as a significantly weaker area, with a rating of 2. Overall, the institution offers a strong academic and campus experience, though it faces challenges in fostering a more diverse international environment.

Professors receive the highest marks, reflecting a strong academic core. Facilities and value also score well, indicating a positive learning environment and good return on investment. However, location and internationality present opportunities for improvement, with lower scores in these areas. Student life and accommodation fall within the middle range of ratings.

This institution receives consistently high marks, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.5. **Value** and **Internationality** are the lowest-rated areas, though still solid at 4.0. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, and Location also demonstrate strong performance, with ratings around 4.3 to 4.4, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

All seven reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise high-quality faculty, excellent curriculum, state-of-the-art facilities, and strong professional training.

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the university's high academic quality, committed professors, flexible study options, and practical learning model.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight strong academic focus, well-prepared professors, and a pleasant campus environment. Students appreciate the emphasis on technical skills and opportunities for discipline specialization.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive. Students praise rigorous economics and law programs, excellent professional preparation, and the university's prestige. No negative feedback was received.

Students report a highly positive experience (~100% of feedback), praising strong organizational support, attentive staff, and engaging learning methods. Some minor navigation and response time issues were noted.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
86%
86%
67%
83%
80%
0%
4★
0%
14%
14%
33%
0%
20%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close