Universidad Nacional de Colombia vs Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA vs Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO vs Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje - SENA vs Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC

Side-by-side comparison from 66 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO (4.90)
Universidad Nacional de Colombia: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO: wins 1/7 categories
Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje - SENA: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de La Salle - LASALLE: wins 1/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Best programme: General Medicine
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
4.07
4.20
4.44
4.88
Win
4.50
4.33
Not rated
Location
4.92
Win
4.80
4.67
4.50
4.50
4.33
Not rated
Professors
4.86
Win
4.60
4.67
4.63
4.63
4.67
Not rated
Internationality
4.21
4.40
Win
4.22
3.50
3.88
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.85
Win
4.40
4.78
4.38
4.00
4.33
Not rated
Value
4.79
4.60
4.56
4.75
4.63
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.85
4.25
4.67
Win
4.29
4.00
3.67
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic quality and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Personal and professional growth opportunities.
  • +Positive and supportive campus environment.
  • +High quality programs and professional teachers
  • +Supportive and amazing study environment with extracurriculars
  • +Emphasis on practical skills and real-world preparation
  • +Valued student talent and supportive development.
  • +High-quality faculty and effective teaching methods.
  • +Efficient problem resolution and excellent curriculum.
  • +Excellent instructors and well-equipped facilities enhance learning.
  • +Practical skills development for career readiness is highly valued.
  • +Innovative programs and support for students entering the workforce are appreciated.
  • +Strong social and community focus
  • +Early patient contact and practical skill development
  • +Student voice and equitable treatment
  • +Excellent professors and quality education/curriculum
  • +Strong focus on ethics and humanistic values
  • +Downtown campus offering urban experience

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching standards are a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication is often poor and unhelpful.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support negatively impact student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are consistently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
  • -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Poor teaching quality and insufficient academic support are disliked.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly for its Location and Student Life, both approaching a perfect score. Professors also receive near-perfect ratings. While Internationality and Value are strong, Facilities are rated moderately well. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, indicating a need for improvement in this category.

Exceptional marks were achieved in several areas, notably for **Location** (4.8) and **Professors** (4.6), along with strong **Value** (4.6). While still positive, **Facilities** and **Accommodation** received the lowest scores at 4.2 and 4.25 respectively. Overall, the university presents a highly regarded environment, with particular strengths in its accessible setting and teaching quality.

Exhibiting generally positive feedback, the university scores highest in Student Life, closely followed by Professors, Location, and Accommodation, all receiving excellent marks. Facilities also perform well. Its weakest area, however, is Internationality, though still receiving a solid rating. Value for money is also highly regarded.

Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, scoring an impressive 4.875. **Professors** also receive high marks at 4.625, alongside a strong **Value** rating of 4.75. The **Location** and **Student Life** also fare well. However, **Internationality** is the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in that aspect of the university experience.

Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths, with an outstanding perfect score for **Value** and high marks for its **Professors**. The **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also received solid ratings. However, **Accomodation** is a moderately weaker area, and **Internationality** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.75/5 average, ~100% of 32 reviews are positive. Students praise excellent academic quality, highly qualified professors, and a supportive, professional environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise high-quality study programs, excellent teachers, and a supportive environment for academic and extracurricular activities. Practical skills and hands-on experience are also highlighted.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.89/5. Students praise high-quality faculty, excellent curriculum, and support for talent development. Some mention campus layout as a minor point.

All 8 reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students frequently praise excellent facilities, capable instructors, and strong preparation for the workforce. There is no negative feedback.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5 stars. Students praise excellent teachers, quality education, and professional training that instills values and ethics.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
81%
40%
89%
50%
56%
33%
0%
4★
13%
40%
11%
50%
44%
67%
0%
3★
6%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close