Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ vs Universidad de los Andes - UNIANDES vs Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO vs Escuela de Administración de Negocios - EAN vs Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN
Side-by-side comparison from 88 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +strong academic programs and well-qualified teachers
- +holistic development through extracurriculars and soft skills
- +supportive campus atmosphere and international community
- +Rigorous, deep, and innovative academic programs with opportunities for interdisciplinary study.
- +Inspiring and experienced international faculty offering precise and relevant learning.
- +Stimulating learning environments with extensive campus facilities and a strong sense of community.
- +High-quality faculty and engaging teaching methods
- +Strong curriculum and diverse, recognized programs
- +Efficient support services and professional growth opportunities
- +Strong focus on entrepreneurship integrated across programs.
- +Diverse language options and specialized career paths within Modern Languages.
- +High-quality teaching, student well-being, and administrative improvements.
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and high-quality teaching
- +Ample green campus spaces
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
- -Poor communication and unsupportive staff are significant drawbacks.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations from staff.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and lack of academic support.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are also significant drawbacks.
- -Inflexible curriculum and teaching methods are a recurring point of dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated curriculum and lack of focus on professional development.
- -Poor administrative and management practices.
- -Limited international opportunities and low university ranking.
Nothing to show
Overall, this university garners strong ratings across multiple aspects. Facilities stand out as a significant strength, alongside excellent scores for professors and student life. While accommodations received the lowest rating, areas such as location, internationality, and value also present a positive picture, indicating a well-rounded experience.
This institution receives high marks overall, with its **Facilities** standing out as the strongest area at 4.69. Professors are also highly rated (4.52), alongside a strong showing for Internationality (4.43) and Value (4.33). Student Life scores well at 4.31. The weakest, though still solid, areas are Location (4.17) and Accomodation (4.05).
Across multiple aspects, this institution receives commendations. Student life stands out as the strongest area, achieving the highest rating. The university also performs exceptionally well in professors, location, and accommodation. On the other hand, its weakest area is internationality, which, while still solid, is rated lower than other categories. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a particularly strong showing in student engagement and academic resources.
This institution garners excellent marks, with professors and location standing out as particularly strong areas, both receiving a perfect score. Student life and value also score highly, indicating a positive overall experience. Facilities and accommodation are rated well, while internationality is a solid but comparatively lower-scoring aspect.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional performance across all surveyed categories, receiving a perfect score of 1 in every aspect. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas, as the university excels uniformly in its facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This indicates a remarkably consistent and high-achieving environment.
Nothing to show
With 27 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong extracurriculars, helpful teachers, and a pleasant atmosphere. Few negative comments exist, representing ~0% of feedback.
With 46 out of 47 reviews being positive, students praise enriching academic opportunities like double majors and innovative teaching methods such as PBL. The university is lauded as number one in Colombia for its rigorous structure and comprehensive curriculum.
With an average rating of 4.88/5 from 8 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise high-quality faculty, excellent curriculum, state-of-the-art facilities, and transformative learning experiences. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~100% of student feedback is positive. Recurring themes highlight the university's focus on sustainable entrepreneurship, diverse language options within programs like Modern Languages, and quality teaching.
Nothing to show
With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are split evenly, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative feedback. Positive comments highlight green spaces and satisfactory teaching quality. Negative reviews criticize obsolete curriculum, focus on money, and lack of international agreements or research promotion.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Ean University is one of the most socially diverse institutions you can find in Bogotá. Its guiding principle is "Sustainable Entrepreneurship"—a philosophy deeply embedded in the curriculum. Regardless of their major, every student is required to engage with this concept at some point in their academic journey. I am currently enrolled in the Modern Languages program, which offers a strong foundation in Spanish and English, along with the option to study additional foreign languages such as German, French, Italian, or Portuguese. The program also allows students to choose from three different areas of emphasis: translation skills, digital communication, or organizational communication. I genuinely enjoy studying at Ean University. It equips students with essential tools for entering the labor market. Even as a student in the Faculty of Humanities, I am required to learn about business and economic strategies—something I find particularly valuable for those who aspire to go beyond language learning and theoretical knowledge. Another aspect I appreciate is how the university supports students in developing their start-up ideas, regardless of whether those ventures are currently successful or still in the early stages. Although the campus is relatively small, it is well-equipped. The classrooms are spacious and offer a variety of useful resources. There are also several social spaces for students to enjoy, including a nap room, a game room, limited green areas, and more. Additionally, the university is located in one of the best areas of the city, surrounded by restaurants, shopping malls, and countless activities—making student life both convenient and vibrant. In my experience, the professors have been excellent—knowledgeable, respectful, and supportive. However, I’m aware that some of my peers have had less positive interactions. That said, not everything has been perfect. The course registration process can vary between being highly efficient and extremely chaotic. I’ve had instances where I had to argue with administrative staff just to complete a simple request, which often took a long time to resolve. Additionally, many students (though not myself) have raised concerns about the curriculum including courses that don’t seem essential to our field—such as statistics, multiple entrepreneurship classes, and geopolitical studies. Overall, my experience at Ean University has been very positive, though there is definitely room for improvement, particularly in administrative processes.
Nothing to show
Do not study here, there are other better universities. The pensum are obsolete. The university is only interested in money. There are no international agreements, they do not have a good ranking, they do not promote research or culture of professional development
Nothing to show