Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Universidad Central - Ucentral vs Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI vs Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB

Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad Central - Ucentral: wins 0/3 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI: wins 1/3 categories
Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB: wins 1/3 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad Antonio Nariño: wins 1/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Fashion Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Management
Best programme: Business Management and Modern Languages and Cultures
Best programme: Entrepreneurship
Best programme: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
Not rated
4.33
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Location
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
4.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.00
Not rated
3.67
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.33
Value
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
4.33
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, accredited programs with well-equipped facilities and practical application of knowledge.
  • +Emphasis on creativity, research, and instilling strong values for responsible and ethical professionals.
  • +Opportunities for diverse practical experiences and national/international student exchange programs.

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive environment & student well-being
  • +Academic focus & professional growth
  • +Welcoming campus & convenient location
  • +Flexible curriculum and teacher willingness
  • +Unorganized internal logistics and outdated facilities
  • +High academic quality and relevant programs
  • +Strong English language focus
  • +Blend of nature and academic facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Expertly trained and specialized faculty
  • +Strong academic quality and comprehensive education
  • +Focus on student well-being and real-world readiness
Cons
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of career services and job placement support.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a perceived lack of student support are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as inflexible or uninspiring.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution boasts impressive strengths in several key areas. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received excellent ratings of 4. Professors also garnered positive feedback with a score of 4. However, facilities represent a weaker point, scoring a 3, while the location received no rating.

Nothing to show

This institution receives notable strengths in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both scoring 4.33. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** also present solid performance, averaging a 4.0. The university's **Student Life** is rated moderately well at 3.67, while **Internationality** stands as its weakest area with a score of 3.

This institution boasts exceptional strengths in its faculty, international student community, and perceived value, all earning a perfect score. Student life, facilities, and accommodation also received high marks, indicating a well-rounded experience. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which unfortunately scored zero.

Excelling in its facilities and international appeal, this institution garners top marks in those areas. Student life, professor quality, and location also receive strong positive feedback, indicating a well-rounded experience. However, the university's value for money is notably lower, standing out as its weakest aspect.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its faculty and location, both receiving perfect scores. Students also appear to highly value the university's offerings, indicated by a strong rating for value. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, student life, and accommodation, which received the lowest scores. Facilities are rated moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.25/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight the high quality physiotherapy program, creative curriculum, and emphasis on developing responsible, dedicated professionals. Facilities and learning tools are also noted as beneficial.

Nothing to show

With 3.8/5 stars from 5 reviews, ~60% are positive, praising a cozy, well-located environment supporting professional growth and well-being. Academics are prioritized. No negative feedback was reported.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, feedback is ~50% positive. Students appreciate the flexibility in course selection due to teacher willingness. However, ~50% of feedback notes unorganized internal logistics and outdated, unrestored facilities.

With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students praise the university's strong academic quality, emphasis on English language education, and adaptation to labor needs. The natural campus environment and excellent facilities are also highlighted.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students consistently praise the university's well-prepared and specialized faculty, highlighting their ability to impart knowledge and prepare students for their professions.

Rating distribution
5★
25%
0%
20%
0%
100%
0%
100%
4★
75%
0%
40%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
40%
50%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close