Universidad Sergio Arboleda vs Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA vs Universidad de los Andes - UNIANDES vs Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO

Side-by-side comparison from 75 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO (4.90)
Universidad Sergio Arboleda: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad de los Andes - UNIANDES: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO: wins 3/7 categories
Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.11
4.20
4.69
Win
4.00
4.44
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.56
4.80
Win
4.17
4.50
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.60
4.52
4.00
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.33
4.40
4.43
5.00
Win
4.22
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.44
4.40
4.31
4.00
4.78
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.22
4.60
Win
4.33
4.00
4.56
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.89
4.25
4.05
4.00
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate professors and vibrant learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and academic opportunities
  • +Strong career support and personal development
  • +High quality programs and professional teachers
  • +Supportive and amazing study environment with extracurriculars
  • +Emphasis on practical skills and real-world preparation
  • +Rigorous, deep, and innovative academic programs with opportunities for interdisciplinary study.
  • +Inspiring and experienced international faculty offering precise and relevant learning.
  • +Stimulating learning environments with extensive campus facilities and a strong sense of community.
  • +Excellent faculty and academic level
  • +Relevant and practical learning experiences
  • +Attractive and accessible campus locations
  • +Valued student talent and supportive development.
  • +High-quality faculty and effective teaching methods.
  • +Efficient problem resolution and excellent curriculum.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of academic rigor and unchallenging coursework.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication is often poor and unhelpful.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations from staff.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and lack of academic support.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support negatively impact student experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.56, and in its **student life**, scoring 4.44. **Facilities** also fare well with a rating of 4.11. Conversely, the **accommodation** category shows the lowest score at 3.89, indicating it as a potential area for improvement. Ratings for professors, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-range.

Exceptional marks were achieved in several areas, notably for **Location** (4.8) and **Professors** (4.6), along with strong **Value** (4.6). While still positive, **Facilities** and **Accommodation** received the lowest scores at 4.2 and 4.25 respectively. Overall, the university presents a highly regarded environment, with particular strengths in its accessible setting and teaching quality.

This institution receives high marks overall, with its **Facilities** standing out as the strongest area at 4.69. Professors are also highly rated (4.52), alongside a strong showing for Internationality (4.43) and Value (4.33). Student Life scores well at 4.31. The weakest, though still solid, areas are Location (4.17) and Accomodation (4.05).

This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.

Exhibiting generally positive feedback, the university scores highest in Student Life, closely followed by Professors, Location, and Accommodation, all receiving excellent marks. Facilities also perform well. Its weakest area, however, is Internationality, though still receiving a solid rating. Value for money is also highly regarded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

About 56% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic opportunities, professors, and growth. A small portion (11.1%) of negative feedback mentions a lack of academic challenge and lazy professors.

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise high-quality study programs, excellent teachers, and a supportive environment for academic and extracurricular activities. Practical skills and hands-on experience are also highlighted.

With 46 out of 47 reviews being positive, students praise enriching academic opportunities like double majors and innovative teaching methods such as PBL. The university is lauded as number one in Colombia for its rigorous structure and comprehensive curriculum.

All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.89/5. Students praise high-quality faculty, excellent curriculum, and support for talent development. Some mention campus layout as a minor point.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
11%
40%
64%
40%
89%
0%
0%
4★
44%
40%
34%
60%
11%
0%
0%
3★
33%
20%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close