Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad vs Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST vs National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education And Research - NIPER vs Malla Reddy University vs Telengana University

Side-by-side comparison from 31 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad: wins 0/5 categories
Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST: wins 0/5 categories
National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education And Research - NIPER: wins 5/5 categories
Malla Reddy University: wins 0/5 categories
Telengana University: wins 0/5 categories
Keshav Memorial Engineering College: wins 0/5 categories
University of Hyderabad - Uoh/ Hcu: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Pharmacology and Innovative Therapeutics
Hyderabad, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Hyderabad, India
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
3.77
3.69
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.85
4.13
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.38
4.44
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.54
3.25
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.31
4.07
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.31
3.75
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.83
2.63
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic reputation and rigorous engineering programs
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty, with practical project exposure
  • +Good campus environment and infrastructure
  • +Supportive and qualified faculty providing engaging guidance.
  • +High-quality programs with a focus on student development.
  • +Inspiring atmosphere and excellent facilities.
  • +Renowned faculty and strong mentorship
  • +Transformative academic experience
  • +Premier institution for pharmaceutical sciences

Nothing to show

  • +focus on sustainability and eco-friendly campus initiatives

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication cause significant frustration.
  • -Limited career opportunities and lack of practical application in coursework are a concern.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication are frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Limited career support and unclear future prospects cause concern.
  • -Students dislike administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency are recurring problems.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. **Professors** and **Student Life** are also highly regarded, alongside the **Value** offered. Conversely, **Internationality** received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** fall within the mid-range ratings.

Academic and student life aspects generally shine, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks (4.44) and **Student Life** (4.07) and **Location** (4.13) also scoring well. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a clear area for improvement, indicated by the lowest rating (2.63). **Facilities** (3.69) and **Value** (3.75) fall in the mid-range, while **Internationality** (3.25) scores moderately.

This institution receives outstanding marks in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. The university also scores highly for value, also earning a 5. Its internationality is the sole area showing a slightly lower rating at 4, though still very positive.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in its facilities, earning a perfect score. It also performs well in professor quality, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all receiving a strong 4 out of 5. The most significant area for improvement, however, is student life, which received a rating of 0.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~85% positive feedback (4-5 stars) and an average rating of 4.38/5, students highlight strong academics, good infrastructure, and helpful faculty. No negative reviews were recorded.

With an average rating of 4.06/5, approximately 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting friendly atmospheres, helpful teachers, and engaging classes. Negative feedback is minimal, representing about 0% of all feedback.

The single review is overwhelmingly positive, rating the university a perfect 5/5. This indicates strong satisfaction with professors and academic experience.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights academic excellence and sustainability, praising the university's eco-friendly initiatives like paperless classrooms and recycling programs.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
54%
31%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
31%
44%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
15%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close