Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad vs Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST vs Indian Institute Of Technology Hyderabad vs Telengana University vs Dr.B.R. Ambedkar Open University

Side-by-side comparison from 30 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Telengana University (5.00)
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad: wins 3/7 categories
Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST: wins 1/7 categories
Indian Institute Of Technology Hyderabad: wins 0/7 categories
Telengana University: wins 3/7 categories
Dr.B.R. Ambedkar Open University: wins 0/7 categories
Keshav Memorial Engineering College: wins 0/7 categories
University of Hyderabad - Uoh/ Hcu: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Hyderabad, India
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
3.77
3.69
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.85
Win
4.13
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.38
4.44
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.54
3.25
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.31
Win
4.07
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.31
Win
3.75
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.83
2.63
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic reputation and rigorous engineering programs
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty, with practical project exposure
  • +Good campus environment and infrastructure
  • +Supportive and qualified faculty providing engaging guidance.
  • +High-quality programs with a focus on student development.
  • +Inspiring atmosphere and excellent facilities.

Nothing to show

  • +focus on sustainability and eco-friendly campus initiatives

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication cause significant frustration.
  • -Limited career opportunities and lack of practical application in coursework are a concern.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication are frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Limited career support and unclear future prospects cause concern.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency are recurring problems.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. **Professors** and **Student Life** are also highly regarded, alongside the **Value** offered. Conversely, **Internationality** received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** fall within the mid-range ratings.

Academic and student life aspects generally shine, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks (4.44) and **Student Life** (4.07) and **Location** (4.13) also scoring well. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a clear area for improvement, indicated by the lowest rating (2.63). **Facilities** (3.69) and **Value** (3.75) fall in the mid-range, while **Internationality** (3.25) scores moderately.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in its facilities, earning a perfect score. It also performs well in professor quality, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all receiving a strong 4 out of 5. The most significant area for improvement, however, is student life, which received a rating of 0.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~85% positive feedback (4-5 stars) and an average rating of 4.38/5, students highlight strong academics, good infrastructure, and helpful faculty. No negative reviews were recorded.

With an average rating of 4.06/5, approximately 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting friendly atmospheres, helpful teachers, and engaging classes. Negative feedback is minimal, representing about 0% of all feedback.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights academic excellence and sustainability, praising the university's eco-friendly initiatives like paperless classrooms and recycling programs.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
54%
31%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
31%
44%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
15%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close