Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad vs Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST vs Birla Institute of Technology and Science - BITS Pilani vs National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education And Research - NIPER vs Telengana University

Side-by-side comparison from 43 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad: wins 0/6 categories
Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST: wins 0/6 categories
Birla Institute of Technology and Science - BITS Pilani: wins 1/6 categories
National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education And Research - NIPER: wins 5/6 categories
Telengana University: wins 0/6 categories
Vignana Bharathi Institute of Technology: wins 0/6 categories
Dr.B.R. Ambedkar Open University: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Pharmacology and Innovative Therapeutics
Hyderabad, India
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
3.77
3.69
4.42
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.85
4.13
4.33
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.38
4.44
4.17
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.54
3.25
4.25
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.31
4.07
4.58
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.31
3.75
4.42
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.83
2.63
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic reputation and rigorous engineering programs
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty, with practical project exposure
  • +Good campus environment and infrastructure
  • +Supportive and qualified faculty providing engaging guidance.
  • +High-quality programs with a focus on student development.
  • +Inspiring atmosphere and excellent facilities.
  • +Excellent faculty and peer learning environment
  • +Strong infrastructure and campus facilities
  • +Abundant career and placement opportunities
  • +Renowned faculty and strong mentorship
  • +Transformative academic experience
  • +Premier institution for pharmaceutical sciences
  • +focus on sustainability and eco-friendly campus initiatives

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication cause significant frustration.
  • -Limited career opportunities and lack of practical application in coursework are a concern.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication are frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Limited career support and unclear future prospects cause concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and relevance in curriculum is a major concern.
  • -Students dislike administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency are recurring problems.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. **Professors** and **Student Life** are also highly regarded, alongside the **Value** offered. Conversely, **Internationality** received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** fall within the mid-range ratings.

Academic and student life aspects generally shine, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks (4.44) and **Student Life** (4.07) and **Location** (4.13) also scoring well. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a clear area for improvement, indicated by the lowest rating (2.63). **Facilities** (3.69) and **Value** (3.75) fall in the mid-range, while **Internationality** (3.25) scores moderately.

Student feedback reveals a generally positive university experience, with **Student Life** being the strongest area, achieving a score of 4.58. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest point, rated at 4. The university also scores well in **Facilities** and **Value** (both 4.42), with **Location** (4.33), **Internationality** (4.25), and **Professors** (4.17) also receiving favorable assessments.

This institution receives outstanding marks in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. The university also scores highly for value, also earning a 5. Its internationality is the sole area showing a slightly lower rating at 4, though still very positive.

This institution excels in its facilities, earning a perfect score. It also performs well in professor quality, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all receiving a strong 4 out of 5. The most significant area for improvement, however, is student life, which received a rating of 0.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~85% positive feedback (4-5 stars) and an average rating of 4.38/5, students highlight strong academics, good infrastructure, and helpful faculty. No negative reviews were recorded.

With an average rating of 4.06/5, approximately 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting friendly atmospheres, helpful teachers, and engaging classes. Negative feedback is minimal, representing about 0% of all feedback.

With an average rating of 4.42/5 from 12 reviews, ~92% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise intellectual peers, excellent labs, helpful faculty, and strong career opportunities. No negative feedback was provided.

The single review is overwhelmingly positive, rating the university a perfect 5/5. This indicates strong satisfaction with professors and academic experience.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights academic excellence and sustainability, praising the university's eco-friendly initiatives like paperless classrooms and recycling programs.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
54%
31%
50%
100%
100%
0%
0%
4★
31%
44%
42%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
15%
25%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close