Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB vs Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO vs Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES vs Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO

Side-by-side comparison from 30 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO: wins 3/5 categories
Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB: wins 1/5 categories
Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO: wins 0/5 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Antonio Nariño: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Advertising
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Entrepreneurship
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.44
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.60
4.67
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.20
4.67
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
4.00
4.22
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
3.00
Student life
3.80
4.78
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.33
Value
4.40
4.56
Win
2.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Accommodation
2.20
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Elite academic programs and strong teachers
  • +Excellent infrastructure and facilities
  • +Humanistic focus and values
  • +Valued student talent and supportive development.
  • +High-quality faculty and effective teaching methods.
  • +Efficient problem resolution and excellent curriculum.
  • +High academic quality and relevant programs
  • +Strong English language focus
  • +Blend of nature and academic facilities
  • +Relevant programs leading to career success
  • +Contribution to economic growth
  • +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
  • +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
  • +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.

Nothing to show

  • +Expertly trained and specialized faculty
  • +Strong academic quality and comprehensive education
  • +Focus on student well-being and real-world readiness
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant concern.
  • -Lack of resources and support impacts the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support negatively impact student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as inflexible or uninspiring.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

An overall assessment of the university reveals a strong performance in several key areas. The location stands out as a particular strength with a rating of 4.6, closely followed by professors at 4.2 and value at 4.4. Facilities and internationality also received a solid 4. Student life is rated moderately at 3.8. The weakest area identified is accommodation, receiving a considerably lower score of 2.2.

Exhibiting generally positive feedback, the university scores highest in Student Life, closely followed by Professors, Location, and Accommodation, all receiving excellent marks. Facilities also perform well. Its weakest area, however, is Internationality, though still receiving a solid rating. Value for money is also highly regarded.

Excelling in its facilities and international appeal, this institution garners top marks in those areas. Student life, professor quality, and location also receive strong positive feedback, indicating a well-rounded experience. However, the university's value for money is notably lower, standing out as its weakest aspect.

This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.

An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its faculty and location, both receiving perfect scores. Students also appear to highly value the university's offerings, indicated by a strong rating for value. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, student life, and accommodation, which received the lowest scores. Facilities are rated moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 12 out of 13 reviews being positive, students highly praise the university's strong tradition, excellent teachers, and quality facilities. Key themes include a humanist approach, elite orientation in economics, and good learning methodologies, with ~92% of feedback being highly positive.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.89/5. Students praise high-quality faculty, excellent curriculum, and support for talent development. Some mention campus layout as a minor point.

With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students praise the university's strong academic quality, emphasis on English language education, and adaptation to labor needs. The natural campus environment and excellent facilities are also highlighted.

With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.

With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students consistently praise the university's well-prepared and specialized faculty, highlighting their ability to impart knowledge and prepare students for their professions.

Rating distribution
5★
54%
89%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
4★
38%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close