Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía vs Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA vs Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB vs Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz - KonradLorenz vs Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO

Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO (5.00)
Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB: wins 0/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz - KonradLorenz: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO: wins 2/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administracion - CESA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Best programme: Advertising
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Architecture
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.20
Win
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.80
4.60
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
4.60
4.20
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
4.40
4.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
4.40
Win
3.80
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
Not rated
4.60
4.40
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
4.25
2.20
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +High quality programs and professional teachers
  • +Supportive and amazing study environment with extracurriculars
  • +Emphasis on practical skills and real-world preparation
  • +Elite academic programs and strong teachers
  • +Excellent infrastructure and facilities
  • +Humanistic focus and values
  • +Practical, relevant assignments and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Strong psychology program.
  • +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
  • +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
  • +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication is often poor and unhelpful.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant concern.
  • -Lack of resources and support impacts the learning experience.
  • -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of transparency and communication causes dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Exceptional marks were achieved in several areas, notably for **Location** (4.8) and **Professors** (4.6), along with strong **Value** (4.6). While still positive, **Facilities** and **Accommodation** received the lowest scores at 4.2 and 4.25 respectively. Overall, the university presents a highly regarded environment, with particular strengths in its accessible setting and teaching quality.

An overall assessment of the university reveals a strong performance in several key areas. The location stands out as a particular strength with a rating of 4.6, closely followed by professors at 4.2 and value at 4.4. Facilities and internationality also received a solid 4. Student life is rated moderately at 3.8. The weakest area identified is accommodation, receiving a considerably lower score of 2.2.

With excellent scores in accommodation and location, this institution shines. Its facilities, professors, and student life also received positive marks. However, its internationality received a more moderate rating, representing the weakest area. Overall, the university offers strong value.

An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise high-quality study programs, excellent teachers, and a supportive environment for academic and extracurricular activities. Practical skills and hands-on experience are also highlighted.

With 12 out of 13 reviews being positive, students highly praise the university's strong tradition, excellent teachers, and quality facilities. Key themes include a humanist approach, elite orientation in economics, and good learning methodologies, with ~92% of feedback being highly positive.

With one review averaging 4/5 stars, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight great professors and practical assignments, though infrastructure issues were noted.

With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
40%
54%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
0%
40%
38%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
20%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close