Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía vs Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES vs Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN vs Universidad de La Salle - LASALLE

Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB: wins 1/7 categories
Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES: wins 0/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de La Salle - LASALLE: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO: wins 3/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Advertising
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Architecture
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Win
4.00
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.60
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
4.00
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
3.80
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Win
4.00
Not rated
Value
Not rated
4.40
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
2.20
Not rated
Not rated
3.67
4.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Elite academic programs and strong teachers
  • +Excellent infrastructure and facilities
  • +Humanistic focus and values
  • +Relevant programs leading to career success
  • +Contribution to economic growth

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent professors and quality education/curriculum
  • +Strong focus on ethics and humanistic values
  • +Downtown campus offering urban experience
  • +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
  • +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
  • +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant concern.
  • -Lack of resources and support impacts the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Poor teaching quality and insufficient academic support are disliked.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

An overall assessment of the university reveals a strong performance in several key areas. The location stands out as a particular strength with a rating of 4.6, closely followed by professors at 4.2 and value at 4.4. Facilities and internationality also received a solid 4. Student life is rated moderately at 3.8. The weakest area identified is accommodation, receiving a considerably lower score of 2.2.

This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths, with an outstanding perfect score for **Value** and high marks for its **Professors**. The **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also received solid ratings. However, **Accomodation** is a moderately weaker area, and **Internationality** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects.

An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With 12 out of 13 reviews being positive, students highly praise the university's strong tradition, excellent teachers, and quality facilities. Key themes include a humanist approach, elite orientation in economics, and good learning methodologies, with ~92% of feedback being highly positive.

With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.

Nothing to show

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5 stars. Students praise excellent teachers, quality education, and professional training that instills values and ethics.

With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
54%
100%
0%
33%
100%
0%
4★
0%
38%
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
3★
0%
8%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close