emlyon business school vs Manipal Academy of Higher Education - MAHE - MU vs Visvesvaraya Technological University vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs OP Jindal Global University - JGU

Side-by-side comparison from 215 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: emlyon business school (4.50)
emlyon business school: wins 1/7 categories
Manipal Academy of Higher Education - MAHE - MU: wins 0/7 categories
Visvesvaraya Technological University: wins 3/7 categories
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 1/7 categories
OP Jindal Global University - JGU: wins 2/7 categories
upGrad: wins 0/7 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Dental Surgery
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
4.12
4.33
3.25
4.44
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.66
3.91
4.27
4.75
Win
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.12
4.13
4.53
Win
3.25
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.63
Win
3.17
3.87
3.50
4.24
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.30
4.30
4.33
Win
3.75
3.88
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.49
3.96
4.53
Win
2.75
3.94
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
3.68
3.93
2.00
4.59
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
  • +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
  • +Diverse program options and personal project development.
  • +Diverse student body and global community
  • +Strong academic programs and industry-relevant knowledge
  • +Supportive faculty and excellent placement support
  • +Excellent learning environment and advanced technology focus
  • +Reputed university with strong academic and practical offerings
  • +Good infrastructure, campus life, and faculty dedication
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth
  • +Practical, real-world focus and curriculum
  • +Supportive faculty and positive learning environment
  • +Good career prospects and specialized programs

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -High tuition fees and poor job placement rates are a major concern.
  • -Limited and often damaged recreational facilities detract from the student experience.
  • -The university offers a poor value for money regarding services provided.
  • -Hectic and outdated academic structure leads to wasted time.
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
  • -High fees and perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Poor quality of accommodation and food.
  • -Institutional focus on finances over student welfare and study quality.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in **Student Life**, boasting a high rating. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive favorable scores. Conversely, **Internationality** and **Accomodation** are identified as areas with lower ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. The university presents a mixed but generally positive outlook across its evaluated components.

With consistently strong scores, the university excels particularly in **Professors** and **Value**, both receiving a near-perfect 4.53. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also stand out with solid 4.33 ratings. The areas that appear to be the weakest, though still respectable, are **Internationality** at 3.87 and **Accomodation** at 3.93.

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its **accommodations**, achieving a near-perfect score. Facilities also received a high rating. Conversely, the **location** was the least positively reviewed aspect. Student life, internationality, and value represent solid middle-ground strengths, with professors also scoring favorably.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.

With a 4.11/5 average rating from 128 reviews, ~83% praise the university for its diverse student body, supportive environment, and robust academic programs. A small minority (~0.8%) found it expensive with limited recreational facilities and placements.

With a ~93% positive sentiment, reviews highlight excellent learning environments, diverse academic offerings, and strong infrastructure. A small ~7% of feedback noted a hectic, outdated academic structure with time-consuming assignments.

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning, well-structured programs, and helpful faculty. A small portion, ~12%, expressed concerns about cost and facilities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
63%
29%
53%
50%
29%
0%
0%
4★
27%
54%
40%
25%
41%
0%
0%
3★
10%
16%
0%
0%
18%
0%
0%
2★
0%
1%
7%
0%
6%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
25%
6%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close