University of Tehran - UT vs Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch vs Tehran University of Medical Sciences - TUMS vs Islamic Azad University Tehran vs Iran University of Medical Sciences - IUMS

Side-by-side comparison from 134 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Islamic Azad University Tehran (5.00)
University of Tehran - UT: wins 2/7 categories
Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch: wins 1/7 categories
Tehran University of Medical Sciences - TUMS: wins 3/7 categories
Islamic Azad University Tehran: wins 1/7 categories
Iran University of Medical Sciences - IUMS: wins 0/7 categories
Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman: wins 0/7 categories
Ershad-Damavand University - دانشگاه ارشاد دماوند : wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Science
Best programme: English Teaching
Best programme: Diagnostic Radiography
Best programme: Dental Surgery
Category ratings
Facilities
4.17
Win
2.80
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.70
4.20
Win
3.40
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.44
3.80
4.18
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.28
3.00
3.36
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.79
Win
3.40
3.55
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.07
3.00
4.18
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.62
2.20
3.82
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert, knowledgeable faculty and rigorous academic programs
  • +Prestigious reputation and rich intellectual environment
  • +Vibrant student life and historic, inspiring campus
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Active research and industry relations support
  • +Welcoming campus environment
  • +Rigorous academic programs and high-quality faculty
  • +Excellent facilities, including modern labs and simulation centers
  • +Strong clinical training and career preparation
  • +High-quality instruction and hands-on experience
  • +Qualified and passionate faculty
  • +State-of-the-art technology

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and unclear policies.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources, such as old equipment and insufficient technology.
  • -Ineffective teaching or curriculum that is not engaging or relevant.
  • -Poor quality of education and academic support.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including unhelpful staff.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources.
  • -Poor management and communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Lack of support and guidance.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is prevalent.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Academic and student experiences are generally well-regarded, with professors earning the highest rating at 4.44. Facilities also score well at 4.17, and value is rated at 4.07. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, which received the lowest score at 3.28, followed by accommodation at 3.62. Student life and location are moderately rated, sitting around the 3.7 mark.

This institution demonstrates a mixed performance across various aspects. Its strongest suit lies in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.2. **Student Life** and **Professors** also stand out positively. Conversely, **Accommodations** present a significant area for improvement, with the lowest rating of 2.2. **Facilities** also lag behind other categories. Ratings for **Internationality** and **Value** are moderate.

This institution demonstrates a strong showing, particularly in its Facilities and Value, both receiving a solid 4. The caliber of Professors also stands out with a high rating of 4.18. On the other hand, Internationality emerged as the area with the lowest score at 3.36. Student Life and Location also received moderate scores, indicating room for improvement.

This institution demonstrates a robust academic environment, excelling with a perfect score for its professors. While facilities and student life are rated moderately, key strengths also emerge in location and perceived value, both receiving a solid 4 out of 5. The university presents a well-rounded experience, with opportunities for improvement in its physical infrastructure and social offerings.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

~100% of reviews are positive, with students frequently praising learned content, knowledgeable professors, and the institution's prestige. A few mention infrastructure challenges or slow administration.

With a 3.6/5 rating, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors and active departments. Around 20% of feedback expressed concerns about education quality impacting future studies abroad.

All 11 reviews are positive, rating the university an average of 4.18/5. Students highlight excellent facilities, rigorous academics, and strong career support. No negative feedback was recorded.

This single review is overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. It highlights esteemed institution status, cutting-edge education, state-of-the-art technology, and approachable, dedicated faculty.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
15%
40%
18%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
70%
0%
82%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
15%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close