Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz - KonradLorenz vs Linnaeus University - LNU vs Lawrence University vs Qassim University vs University of Maryland Baltimore County - UMBC
Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, relevant assignments and knowledgeable professors.
- +Strong psychology program.
- +Supportive and helpful professors and staff.
- +Good facilities and diverse academic programs.
- +Welcoming international environment and convenient resources.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Supportive academic environment and approachable professors
- +Strong career support and diverse opportunities
- +Welcoming and inclusive campus community
- +Inclusive and open community
- +Focus on holistic development
- +Caring and supportive professors
- +Encouragement and belief in student potential
- -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of transparency and communication causes dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues, particularly concerning international student affairs.
- -Mediocre teaching quality with limited value beyond independent learning.
- -Lack of industry connections and career support.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of effective communication and transparency from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of instructor engagement and support is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues, including disorganized faculty and financial aid.
- -Lack of student support from advisors.
With excellent scores in accommodation and location, this institution shines. Its facilities, professors, and student life also received positive marks. However, its internationality received a more moderate rating, representing the weakest area. Overall, the university offers strong value.
Academic and student life aspects of the university received high marks. The institution particularly excelled in Internationality (4.27) and Student Life (4.23), reflecting a vibrant and globally-connected campus environment. Facilities (4.16) and Professors (4.12) also garnered positive feedback. Conversely, Value (3.81) and Location (3.83) were the lowest-rated categories, suggesting areas for potential improvement. Accommodations also scored moderately (3.92).
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution excels with perfect scores in Facilities and Internationality. Professors and Value also received strong ratings, alongside Accomodation and Location which performed well. Student Life, however, stands out as a weaker area compared to the other evaluated aspects.
This institution garners exceptional marks in several key areas, notably excelling in Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, all receiving perfect scores. Professors also received a strong rating. Conversely, the Facilities category stands out as the weakest, with a rating of 0.
This institution presents a consistent, mid-range performance across most evaluated aspects. Its strongest areas are Facilities, Professors, and Location, all receiving a solid 3 out of 5. Conversely, the university faces challenges in Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, each scoring 2.5, indicating these are its weakest points for consideration.
With one review averaging 4/5 stars, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight great professors and practical assignments, though infrastructure issues were noted.
About 80% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive professors, a welcoming atmosphere, and good facilities. A small portion (~7%) of negative feedback points to issues with teaching quality and administrative support.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.75/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight a supportive academic environment, strong career preparation, and campus inclusivity. There are no negative reviews in this sample.
With one review, the average rating is 4/5 stars. The feedback highlights inclusivity and a welcoming environment. No negative comments were recorded.
With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is split evenly between positive and negative experiences. Positive reviews highlight caring professors who offer support and encouragement. Negative reviews cite issues with campus culture, faculty, and a lack of advising support.
Nothing to show
Rating: ★★☆☆☆ (2/5 — one extra star because tuition was free) I studied Software Technology at Linnaeus University between 2022 and 2025. In my experience, the quality of teaching was mediocre. I quickly stopped attending lectures because most added little beyond what I could learn independently. Industry connections were almost nonexistent: no internship support, no company-led workshops, no hackathons, and no clear pathways into the tech sector. The only recurring event was the annual job fair, but many representatives seemed unsure what they were seeking; most offered no internships or projects and there was rarely any follow-up, so it felt more promotional than student-focused. Entrepreneurship support was minimal. When we started a student project, there was no funding, no events, no network, and very limited guidance — essentially just one counsellor providing basic advice. Faculty culture felt very political and unresponsive to student feedback. When issues were raised formally, they were often dismissed, though quiet changes were occasionally made later. I personally experienced hostile and dismissive behaviour from a lecturer in the tech faculty, which I reported to the Student Union in 2024 along with other classmates. The case was closed in the lecturer’s favour, yet the university quietly implemented some of the changes we had requested. The complaint process left me uncertain about its independence, and I believe there’s a need for more transparent procedures and external oversight. On the positive side, there are a few excellent professors who genuinely care about their students and involve them in research, but they are a small minority and you have to actively seek them out. Overall, I’m deeply disappointed with the university’s approach to education and student development. I feel I wasted three years of potential growth and opportunity here. Prospective students should do thorough research and speak directly with current students before enrolling.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show