Universidad de Oriente - UDO vs Université de Strasbourg - UNISTRA vs The City College of New York- CCNY vs Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology - JKUAT vs Virtual University of Pakistan
Side-by-side comparison from 246 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent professors and solid education
- +Personal and professional growth opportunities
- +Valuable practical experience and industry exposure
- +International environment and diverse student life
- +High-quality academics and supportive professors
- +Engaging courses with practical applications
- +Supportive faculty and engaging classes
- +Beautiful campus and accessible financial aid
- +Personalized academic support through programs like SEEK
- +Professional and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Practical and analytical academic programs
- +Supportive environment for dedicated students
- +Flexible online learning
- +Organized and accessible platform
- +High-quality education and support
Nothing to show
- +Applied learning and practical experience
- +Personal growth and increased responsibility
- +Enhanced knowledge and future confidence
- -Lack of administrative support and poor communication.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Limited career services and internship opportunities.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities, including dirty and neglected campus areas and issues with pests in student residences and dining facilities.
- -Significant administrative and management problems that negatively impact student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Lacking and outdated facilities.
- -Trainer knowledge not meeting expectations.
- -Lack of faculty support and guidance.
- -Repetitive coursework and limited career prospects.
- -Delayed project supervision.
- -Administrative and communication issues are poorly handled.
- -Study materials are outdated.
- -Support systems are ineffective and unresponsive.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and overall experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency causes confusion and dissatisfaction.
This institution's strengths lie significantly in its **Professors**, scoring a high 4.16. **Student Life** and **Value** also present positively with ratings of 3.44 and 3.84 respectively. However, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, registering a considerably lower score of 2.61. **Accomodation** and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range.
With a strong emphasis on student experience, this university excels in **Student Life** and **Location**, both receiving ratings above 4.4. **Internationality** also scores well at 4.27. Areas for improvement include **Accomodation**, which earned the lowest score at 3.73, followed by **Facilities** at 3.95. **Professors** and **Value** demonstrate solid performance, with ratings around 4.1.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in student life, earning a high rating in this area. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like facilities, location, and internationality are rated moderately well, while professor quality and value are also mid-range.
This university garners high marks in several key areas, notably excelling in **Location** (4.47) and **Value** (4.35). Professors (4.33) and Student Life (4.27) also received very positive feedback. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, scoring 3.69. Facilities and Internationality are rated moderately well, falling in the high 3s.
This institution receives its highest marks for **Professors**, averaging an impressive 4.35. **Location** and **Value** also score well, both above 4.0. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the lowest-rated area at 3.59. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are rated identically at 3.72, while **Internationality** sits at a solid 4.0.
Nothing to show
This university garners impressive scores across most aspects, with its **location receiving a perfect 5.0**. Facilities, professors, and student life are also highly rated at 4.5. While internationality scores a respectable 4.0, **accommodation stands out as the weakest area with a score of 3.5**, indicating room for improvement. Overall, the value is considered good at 4.0.
With an average rating of 4.1/5 from 31 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent professors, solid education, and personal/professional growth. No negative reviews were received.
University of Strasbourg reviews are predominantly positive (~97.6%), highlighting international atmosphere, knowledgeable professors, and engaging courses. A small fraction (~2.4%) notes issues with campus maintenance and facilities.
Half of reviews are negative, citing lacking facilities and poor administration. Positive feedback highlights attentive professors, engaging classes, and financial aid.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~98% of reviews being favorable. Students praise its strong academic programs, professional lecturers, and enriching learning environment, particularly in STEM and agriculture. A small percentage report issues with faculty support and course structure.
With ~90% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.15/5, students praise the university's organized platform, flexible online learning, and accessible education. A small ~10% of reviews mention issues with outdated materials and unhelpful, unresponsive support.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating from two reviews, feedback is largely positive. Students highlight significant growth, enhanced knowledge, and increased confidence.
The infrastructure is not the best but the education is amazing, as a doctor I’ve learn how to deal and solve any kind of situation and putting the health of the community first even when we live in a country where we don’t have the necessary resources to have the best work environment
The ITIRI (faculty of translation) guarantees a high-quality linguistic preparation, as long as some practical classes that help understand what it would really be like to be a translator. There's an admission test and it costs 4500 per year. The master lasts 2 years.
Nothing to show
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology is one of the best universities in Kenya, as a personal opinion and one that is recommended nationally. I went there first because it was a few kilometres away from home and I wanted the experience of living alone and generally to feel like an adult. It was home away from home, that I even stayed one year later even after graduation. The lecturers were quite tough which was a good thing because I almost didn't graduate because I had missed a few classes. All my practical units that required extra coursework outside class always had the lecturers in attendance even when they didn't have to. My lecturers were very friendly and very practical on what the course I did would translate to once I finished. The security was very good especially for a single female young lady miles away from home. There was plenty of room to study, from parks all around the university, the student centre and the library. You could also easily access help from the administration and get to the staff offices for extra help from our lectures without going through loops. I loved it there and yes, I would recommend it to a family or friend, depending on the course they plan to do. I was an introvert in campus but I remember trying things like rollball, table tennis, pool, drama which are available and active even till date.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
