Universidad de Oriente - UDO vs Université de Strasbourg - UNISTRA vs Instituto Tecnológico de Celaya - ITCelaya vs Lambda School vs University of Jan Evangelista in Ústí nad Labem
Side-by-side comparison from 76 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent professors and solid education
- +Personal and professional growth opportunities
- +Valuable practical experience and industry exposure
- +International environment and diverse student life
- +High-quality academics and supportive professors
- +Engaging courses with practical applications
- +Excellent academic and sports facilities
- +Attentive and supportive professors
- +Vibrant and focused student community
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic foundation and practical skill development
- +Supportive learning environment and personal professor attention
- +Modern facilities and industry-relevant experience
Nothing to show
- -Lack of administrative support and poor communication.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Limited career services and internship opportunities.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities, including dirty and neglected campus areas and issues with pests in student residences and dining facilities.
- -Significant administrative and management problems that negatively impact student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance disappoints students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resource management are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is a common complaint.
Nothing to show
This institution's strengths lie significantly in its **Professors**, scoring a high 4.16. **Student Life** and **Value** also present positively with ratings of 3.44 and 3.84 respectively. However, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, registering a considerably lower score of 2.61. **Accomodation** and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range.
With a strong emphasis on student experience, this university excels in **Student Life** and **Location**, both receiving ratings above 4.4. **Internationality** also scores well at 4.27. Areas for improvement include **Accomodation**, which earned the lowest score at 3.73, followed by **Facilities** at 3.95. **Professors** and **Value** demonstrate solid performance, with ratings around 4.1.
This institution receives outstanding marks in several key areas. Professors are rated as excellent, and student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all considered exceptional. Facilities and location also score highly, indicating a strong overall offering. The weakest, though still very good, aspect is the facilities rating.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With exceptionally high marks across most categories, this institution excels in its **facilities**, receiving a perfect score of 5. **Professors**, **location**, **internationality**, and **value** are also areas of significant strength, all rated at 4.5. **Student life** and **accommodation** are solid, though slightly lower at 4, representing the weakest points within an otherwise outstanding assessment.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.1/5 from 31 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent professors, solid education, and personal/professional growth. No negative reviews were received.
University of Strasbourg reviews are predominantly positive (~97.6%), highlighting international atmosphere, knowledgeable professors, and engaging courses. A small fraction (~2.4%) notes issues with campus maintenance and facilities.
With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). The single review highlights abundant academic and sports facilities, attentive professors, and a vibrant campus atmosphere.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong academics, skill development, and a diverse environment. Practical experience and supportive learning are also frequently praised.
Nothing to show
The infrastructure is not the best but the education is amazing, as a doctor I’ve learn how to deal and solve any kind of situation and putting the health of the community first even when we live in a country where we don’t have the necessary resources to have the best work environment
The ITIRI (faculty of translation) guarantees a high-quality linguistic preparation, as long as some practical classes that help understand what it would really be like to be a translator. There's an admission test and it costs 4500 per year. The master lasts 2 years.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
