Università degli Studi di Firenze - UNIFI vs The Florence Institute of Design International - F.I.D.I. vs Istituto Marangoni vs European School of Economics - ESE vs SSML Carlo Bo
Side-by-side comparison from 69 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Interdisciplinary and well-structured programs
- +Competent and available teachers
- +Opportunities for internships and practical experience
- +Immersive learning environment in a historically rich city
- +High-quality, well-designed facilities
- +Enriching personal and academic experience
- +Global fashion hub and career opportunities
- +Inspiring teachers and valuable learning experiences
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
- +Rich learning environments and personal growth opportunities
- +Immersive language learning with native speakers
- +Effective, practical language training with small class sizes
Nothing to show
- +Practical job-focused learning
- +International exchange opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources impede learning.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of support are recurring problems.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are significant problems.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
- -Administrative and management issues create constant problems.
- -Outdated facilities are consistently a source of frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring theme.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are commonly criticized.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as uninspiring or ineffective.
Assessing the university's performance reveals strengths in its faculty, which received a perfect score of 4, and a solid rating for student life and location, both at 3.68. Areas with lower scores include internationality at 3.1, and facilities and accommodation, both at 3.42. The overall value of the university is rated at 3.55.
Across all surveyed categories, this university received a rating of 0. Consequently, there are no strongest or weakest areas to highlight, as performance was uniformly absent. The institution appears to lack any positive attributes in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value.
This institution shines particularly brightly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving excellent scores. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out as strong points. Conversely, the **Facilities** represent the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other aspects. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement but also solid performance.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for **Location** and **Value**. **Professors** also garnered a very strong rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest marks, indicating a potential area for improvement, while **Facilities** and **Internationality** received moderate ratings. **Student Life** was also positively rated.
Nothing to show
A nuanced performance is evident in these university ratings, with notable strengths in **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all receiving a score of 4. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** stand out as weaker areas, each scoring a 2. Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately at 3. Overall, the university excels in academic and global aspects, but faces challenges in its physical environment and student housing.
The university has a high average rating of 3.86/5, with 15 out of 22 reviews being positive. Students praise the interdisciplinary programs, competent and available teachers, and good course structures. No negative reviews were reported.
This university receives a high average rating of 4/5 stars. Positive feedback highlights enriching learning experiences and the unique environment. No negative reviews were recorded, representing approximately 0% of feedback.
With a 3.67 average rating, positive feedback (~33%) highlights fashion business opportunities and inspiring teachers. No negative reviews were provided.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a 4.67/5 average rating from 3 reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Key themes highlight enriching educational experiences and effective language learning through native-speaking instructors and small class sizes. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating from 1 review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students appreciate learning practical skills and the university's international connections for study abroad opportunities.
I have been studying at the University of Florence for 2 years, I am very well, the teachers are very competent and available, the course is well structured and the university offers various opportunities for undertaking curricular and non-curricular internships. The city is beautiful and offers a lot of fun for students
Learning design in the city of Florence is almost automatic, because the eyes watch captivating art, history and good taste in every corner, everyday. Studying a Master in Interior Design at F.I.D.I. was an experience that deeply enriched my life. In terms of space, the Institute is an excellent example of European Interior Design: well-conserved facade and frescoes of the 1700's on the ceilings and walls mix with new materials and pieces of contemporary furniture, creating a balanced, unique and intimate atmosphere. As I came from a very large university with many campuses in my country, F.I.D.I.'s attention to detail, neatness and personalization felt exquisite. Lessons were given in small groups, teachers are well prepared and actually enjoy what they are doing. From them I learned to observe closely, in order to start designing with quality, always respecting and appreciating the value of places and objects. Possibly the two things I would change are: 1) that teachers plan new projects for their new students to work. Florence has too many highlights and, as I keep in touch with the Institute at social media, I see that they are still making one of the projects that was asigned to my generation 7 years ago, and 2) that it lasted longer. Masters are usually longer to give students a steady formation.
I like a lot of it but I feel like the subject teaches us the same every time. There should be more diversity in our contents and make us work more in groups and do more exercises in class, in order words the classes should be more dynamic
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
