Universidad de los Andes - UNIANDES vs Universidad del Rosario - UROSARIO vs Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES
Side-by-side comparison from 81 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Rigorous, deep, and innovative academic programs with opportunities for interdisciplinary study.
- +Inspiring and experienced international faculty offering precise and relevant learning.
- +Stimulating learning environments with extensive campus facilities and a strong sense of community.
- +Innovative programs with practical application and real-world projects
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors dedicated to student growth
- +Comprehensive and ethical education fostering personal and professional development
- +Excellent faculty and academic level
- +Relevant and practical learning experiences
- +Attractive and accessible campus locations
- +Flexible curriculum and teacher willingness
- +Unorganized internal logistics and outdated facilities
- +Relevant programs leading to career success
- +Contribution to economic growth
- +Expert faculty and hands-on learning
- +Diverse and in-demand programs
- +Convenient campus access
Nothing to show
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations from staff.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and lack of academic support.
- -Inefficient administrative and communication issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor quality of teaching and curriculum development is a significant concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and a perceived lack of student support are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a common complaint.
- -Lack of support and unclear expectations contribute to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
This institution receives high marks overall, with its **Facilities** standing out as the strongest area at 4.69. Professors are also highly rated (4.52), alongside a strong showing for Internationality (4.43) and Value (4.33). Student Life scores well at 4.31. The weakest, though still solid, areas are Location (4.17) and Accomodation (4.05).
An overview of the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. Professors and student life emerge as the strongest areas, both receiving high marks. Internationality and value are also rated very favorably. Facilities, location, and accommodation, while still respectable, represent the weaker aspects of the university's offerings, scoring lower than other categories.
This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.
This institution boasts exceptional strengths in its faculty, international student community, and perceived value, all earning a perfect score. Student life, facilities, and accommodation also received high marks, indicating a well-rounded experience. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which unfortunately scored zero.
This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.
This institution demonstrates a notable strength in the quality of its professors, receiving a perfect score. Conversely, its location received no rating, indicating a potential area for improvement or a lack of data. Other aspects like facilities, student life, and accommodation were moderately rated, suggesting a generally satisfactory experience. Internationality scores were lower, and value for money was rated well.
Nothing to show
With 46 out of 47 reviews being positive, students praise enriching academic opportunities like double majors and innovative teaching methods such as PBL. The university is lauded as number one in Colombia for its rigorous structure and comprehensive curriculum.
With ~100% positive feedback and an average of 4.54/5 stars, reviews highlight an innovative and comprehensive education. Students appreciate knowledgeable professors, practical projects, and opportunities for growth and international experiences.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, feedback is ~50% positive. Students appreciate the flexibility in course selection due to teacher willingness. However, ~50% of feedback notes unorganized internal logistics and outdated, unrestored facilities.
With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.
With an average rating of 5/5, all feedback is positive. Students praise the excellent faculty, good clinical sites, and the seamless integration of theory and practice. Accessibility via public transport or car is also highlighted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show