Universidad El Bosque vs Universidad Nacional de Colombia vs Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA vs Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito vs Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje - SENA

Side-by-side comparison from 59 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Nacional de Colombia (4.80)
Universidad El Bosque: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Nacional de Colombia: wins 3/6 categories
Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA: wins 1/6 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito: wins 1/6 categories
Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje - SENA: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad de La Salle - LASALLE: wins 0/6 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
4.83
4.07
4.20
5.00
Win
4.88
4.33
Not rated
Location
4.71
4.92
Win
4.80
4.50
4.50
4.33
Not rated
Professors
4.57
4.86
Win
4.60
4.50
4.63
4.67
Not rated
Internationality
3.43
4.21
4.40
Win
2.00
3.50
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.29
4.85
Win
4.40
4.50
4.38
4.33
Not rated
Value
4.14
4.79
4.60
5.00
4.75
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.67
3.85
4.25
4.00
4.29
Win
3.67
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong medical and nursing programs with practical experience opportunities
  • +Supportive and collaborative environment with friendly teachers and peers
  • +Excellent personal and professional development opportunities, including exchanges
  • +High academic quality and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Personal and professional growth opportunities.
  • +Positive and supportive campus environment.
  • +High quality programs and professional teachers
  • +Supportive and amazing study environment with extracurriculars
  • +Emphasis on practical skills and real-world preparation
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong academic rigor and technical focus
  • +Pleasant campus environment
  • +Excellent instructors and well-equipped facilities enhance learning.
  • +Practical skills development for career readiness is highly valued.
  • +Innovative programs and support for students entering the workforce are appreciated.
  • +Excellent professors and quality education/curriculum
  • +Strong focus on ethics and humanistic values
  • +Downtown campus offering urban experience

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching standards are a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication is often poor and unhelpful.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and industry relevance is a common concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are consistently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Poor teaching quality and insufficient academic support are disliked.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates significant strengths. It excels particularly in its **Facilities**, receiving an outstanding rating. **Professors** and **Location** also scored highly. However, areas requiring improvement include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, which received the lowest scores. **Student Life** and **Value** fall within a moderate range of satisfaction.

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly for its Location and Student Life, both approaching a perfect score. Professors also receive near-perfect ratings. While Internationality and Value are strong, Facilities are rated moderately well. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, indicating a need for improvement in this category.

Exceptional marks were achieved in several areas, notably for **Location** (4.8) and **Professors** (4.6), along with strong **Value** (4.6). While still positive, **Facilities** and **Accommodation** received the lowest scores at 4.2 and 4.25 respectively. Overall, the university presents a highly regarded environment, with particular strengths in its accessible setting and teaching quality.

This university scores exceptionally well in areas like Facilities and Value, both receiving a perfect 5. Professors, Location, and Student Life are also highly rated at 4.5. Accommodations are solid at 4. However, Internationality stands out as a significantly weaker area, with a rating of 2. Overall, the institution offers a strong academic and campus experience, though it faces challenges in fostering a more diverse international environment.

Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, scoring an impressive 4.875. **Professors** also receive high marks at 4.625, alongside a strong **Value** rating of 4.75. The **Location** and **Student Life** also fare well. However, **Internationality** is the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in that aspect of the university experience.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths, with an outstanding perfect score for **Value** and high marks for its **Professors**. The **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also received solid ratings. However, **Accomodation** is a moderately weaker area, and **Internationality** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~88%), highlighting strong medical programs, excellent personal/professional development opportunities, and positive learning environments with good facilities. No negative reviews were provided.

With a 4.75/5 average, ~100% of 32 reviews are positive. Students praise excellent academic quality, highly qualified professors, and a supportive, professional environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise high-quality study programs, excellent teachers, and a supportive environment for academic and extracurricular activities. Practical skills and hands-on experience are also highlighted.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight strong academic focus, well-prepared professors, and a pleasant campus environment. Students appreciate the emphasis on technical skills and opportunities for discipline specialization.

All 8 reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students frequently praise excellent facilities, capable instructors, and strong preparation for the workforce. There is no negative feedback.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5 stars. Students praise excellent teachers, quality education, and professional training that instills values and ethics.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
63%
81%
40%
67%
50%
33%
0%
4★
25%
13%
40%
33%
50%
67%
0%
3★
13%
6%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close