Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador - PUCE vs Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ vs Escuela Politécnica Nacional - EPN vs Universidad Central del Ecuador - UCE vs Universidad Internacional Del Ecuador - UIDE

Side-by-side comparison from 52 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Politécnica Salesiana (5.00)
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador - PUCE: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ: wins 0/7 categories
Escuela Politécnica Nacional - EPN: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Central del Ecuador - UCE: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Internacional Del Ecuador - UIDE: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de las Américas - UDLA: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Politécnica Salesiana: wins 6/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Music
Best programme: English Language Teaching
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Interior Design
Best programme: BSc Psychology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.13
4.32
Not rated
2.50
4.33
4.00
5.00
Win
Location
4.13
4.32
Not rated
4.50
3.00
4.50
5.00
Win
Professors
4.00
4.27
Not rated
3.00
4.17
4.50
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.38
4.14
Not rated
3.00
3.50
4.50
Win
4.00
Student life
3.71
4.36
Not rated
3.50
3.67
4.50
5.00
Win
Value
4.13
4.10
Not rated
4.50
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.14
3.88
Not rated
2.00
3.33
4.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Balanced theory/practice with technical/management training
  • +Strong academic quality and ethical/moral values
  • +Opportunities for research and professional development
  • +Holistic and diverse academic programs.
  • +Excellent professors and personal/professional growth.
  • +Beautiful campus and vibrant student community.
  • +Academic excellence & scientific/humanistic standards
  • +Social support & cultural activities
  • +Central location & diverse career options
  • +Accessible location and affordable tuition
  • +Experienced faculty and valuable learning environment
  • +High-quality professional outcomes
  • +Accessible, supportive faculty and quality programs
  • +Modern facilities and beautiful campus environment
  • +Flexible scheduling and manageable workload
  • +Inspiring and enriching academic experiences
  • +Access to useful digital tools and apps
  • +Fantastic campus facilities
  • +Excellent teachers and professional preparation
  • +Strong academic and practical skill development
Cons
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and poor communication create frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible policies and a lack of student support contribute to dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and poor management cause frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major issue.
  • -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary complications.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and engagement from instructors is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and resources negatively impacts student well-being.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
  • -Inconsistent or poor teaching quality negatively impacts the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

Across surveyed categories, the university demonstrates a strong showing in Facilities, Location, and Value, all receiving a 4.125. Professors also earned a respectable 4. Student Life and Internationality scored moderately, while Accommodations presented as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.14. Overall, the institution excels in tangible aspects and academic instruction, with room for improvement noted in student living arrangements and global engagement.

Students generally hold the university in high regard, with excellent scores for Student Life (4.36) and Location (4.32). Facilities also received a strong rating of 4.32. While professors (4.27) and internationality (4.14) are also well-received, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a rating of 3.88. Value for money is rated a respectable 4.10.

This institution presents a uniform, undeveloped profile across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths. Conversely, every category equally represents the institution's weakest areas, indicating a comprehensive lack of development or positive perception in these fundamental university components.

This institution excels in its **location** and **value**, both receiving high marks. Conversely, **accommodations** and **facilities** present the weakest areas, scoring significantly lower. Professor quality and student life are rated moderately well, as is its international presence.

This institution receives excellent marks for its **Facilities**, scoring a strong 4.33. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out with high ratings, at 4.17 and 4 respectively. Conversely, **Location** emerges as the weakest area, with a score of 3. Student life, accommodation, and internationality fall within the mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional experience in these aspects.

This institution garners strong positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving 4.5 out of 5. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded with a rating of 4. Similarly, **Value** is rated a solid 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is **Facilities** at 4. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across multiple dimensions.

This institution scores exceptionally well across most assessed aspects. Its strengths are evident in facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving a perfect score of 5. While still strong, internationality is the area with the lowest rating at 4. Overall, the university offers excellent value.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 12 out of 13 reviews being positive (approx. 92%), students highlight PUCE's strong curriculum blending theory and practice. They also praise the excellent student environment, promotion of values, and comprehensive training that shapes professionals.

With an average rating of 4.42/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university's holistic curriculum, excellent professors, and opportunities for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise the university's strong academic programs, social opportunities, and contribution to national development.

With an average rating of 4/5 from three reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is positive. Students praise the university's accessibility and affordability. Limited negative feedback exists.

With an average rating of 4.17/5 and no negative feedback, reviews highlight a comprehensive medical program, accessible professors, and modern facilities. Students also appreciate flexible schedules and beautiful, distraction-free campus environments.

Students report enriching and inspiring experiences, particularly in areas like Interior Design and historical home restoration. The university provides helpful tools for progress, though some find navigating the campus and dining options challenging. No negative feedback was received.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise exceptional teaching quality, noting excellent preparation for academic and professional challenges. No negative reviews were provided.

Rating distribution
5★
15%
50%
33%
33%
33%
50%
100%
4★
77%
42%
67%
33%
50%
50%
0%
3★
8%
8%
0%
33%
17%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Building Future Doctors: UIDE's Medical Program

My experience at UIDE's Medical School was largely positive. The program is comprehensive, offering a solid foundation in both basic sciences and clinical practice. The professors were generally well-trained and accessible, always willing to provide additional support when needed. The university boasts modern facilities, including well-equipped classrooms and laboratories, although I feel there could be more emphasis on clinical exposure from the earlier years of the program. The library and resources are adequate, but I believe better access to digital resources and scientific databases would be beneficial for students. The university environment is inclusive, with a diverse student body that creates a collaborative and supportive atmosphere. While the university offers valuable professional development opportunities, such as internships and clinical placements, I found that some of these could have been better organized to maximize their impact. Despite these areas for improvement, I would recommend UIDE to prospective medical students. The university provides a solid education and ample opportunities for professional growth, and I am confident that it will continue to evolve and improve in key areas, making it a great choice for those pursuing a medical career.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close