Chennai Business School - CBS vs SRM University vs Christ University Bangalore vs Prist University vs WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN COLLEGE

Side-by-side comparison from 66 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Chennai Business School - CBS: wins 0/2 categories
SRM University: wins 0/2 categories
Christ University Bangalore: wins 0/2 categories
Prist University: wins 0/2 categories
WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: wins 0/2 categories
Indian maritime University: wins 2/2 categories
Manonmaniam Sundaranar University: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Chennai, India
4.30
Read more reviews
32 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Chennai, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Visual Communication Design
Best programme: Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Physics
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.88
3.79
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
Location
Not rated
3.47
3.68
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
Professors
Not rated
3.50
3.72
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
Internationality
Not rated
3.50
3.83
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Student life
Not rated
3.93
3.69
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
Value
Not rated
3.88
3.73
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Accommodation
Not rated
3.81
3.03
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +High-quality education and helpful, experienced professors.
  • +Excellent exposure through diverse programs and industry-aligned curriculum.
  • +Strong focus on placements and practical learning experiences.
  • +Structured academics, discipline, and personal development opportunities
  • +Excellent infrastructure, facilities, and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Strong academic programs with good placement prospects and exposure

Nothing to show

  • +Strong campus culture and student involvement
  • +Good brand recognition
  • +Comprehensive maritime training and industry exposure
  • +Strong foundational knowledge in core maritime subjects
  • +Practical preparation for real-world industry challenges
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
  • +Well-equipped labs and effective curriculum
  • +Enjoyable campus life
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Biased faculty and unfair grading practices.
  • -Poor campus life and lack of support for genuine talent.
  • -Strict, overly disciplined environment with limited freedom and scope for innovation.
  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of practical relevance make it a poor academic experience.
  • -Poor management and administrative issues lead to student frustration and feelings of being misled.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor resource availability are major drawbacks.
  • -Instruction quality and course relevance are frequently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary confusion and delays.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and student experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling unheard and unsupported.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support leaves students feeling unsupported.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution achieves strong performance, particularly in Student Life, with a rating of 3.93. Facilities and Value also score highly at 3.875. The university's Location, however, received the lowest rating at 3.47, alongside Professors and Internationality which both scored 3.5. Accommodations also received a solid rating of 3.81.

This university garners positive feedback across multiple aspects, with Internationality emerging as its strongest suit at 3.83. Facilities also score well at 3.79. Areas like Value and Professors are rated a solid 3.72. Student Life and Location are closely behind, both above 3.65. The most significant area for improvement appears to be Accomodation, receiving the lowest rating of 3.03.

Nothing to show

This institution receives outstanding scores in several key areas, notably its facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation, all earning a perfect 5 out of 5. Areas for potential improvement lie in internationality and value, which are rated a solid 4 out of 5, indicating good but not exceptional standing.

This institution garners outstanding reviews across every aspect. With perfect scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no discernible weak areas. The university excels universally, indicating a consistently high-quality experience for its students in all surveyed dimensions.

This institution receives near-perfect scores across the board, reflecting outstanding performance in its facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation, all scoring a perfect five. While still strong, the university's internationality and value received slightly lower, though still excellent, ratings of four.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

University reviews are predominantly positive, with an average rating of 4.34/5. Students praise the quality of education, helpful faculty, and good environment. A small portion (~3%) expressed concerns about campus life and faculty bias.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting structured academics, campus life, and personal development. Around 17% of feedback is negative, citing strictness, outdated curriculum, and management issues.

Nothing to show

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (100%), with students highlighting campus life and brand recognition. There is no negative feedback provided.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students describe the university as impactful and one of the best, highlighting strong foundational training and significant exposure to the maritime world.

With an average rating of 4/5, the single review highlights positive curriculum coverage, supportive staff, and good labs. Infrastructure and syllabus advancement are areas noted for improvement, representing ~0% negative feedback.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
56%
17%
0%
100%
100%
0%
4★
0%
28%
57%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
13%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
3%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close