Christ University Bangalore vs Loyola College vs Indian Institute of Technology Madras vs DG Vaishnav College vs SASTRA Deemed University

Side-by-side comparison from 51 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Indian Institute of Technology Madras (4.80)
Christ University Bangalore: wins 0/7 categories
Loyola College: wins 0/7 categories
Indian Institute of Technology Madras: wins 6/7 categories
DG Vaishnav College: wins 0/7 categories
SASTRA Deemed University: wins 0/7 categories
The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University: wins 0/7 categories
Thiruvalluvar University: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Chennai, India
4.50
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Data Science and Artificial Intelligence
Chennai, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Physician Associate Studies
Best programme: Psychology (Developmental and Educational)
Category ratings
Facilities
3.79
4.00
4.75
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Location
3.68
4.57
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Professors
3.72
4.60
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Internationality
3.83
4.13
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Student life
3.69
4.33
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Value
3.73
4.13
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.03
3.47
4.25
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Structured academics, discipline, and personal development opportunities
  • +Excellent infrastructure, facilities, and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Strong academic programs with good placement prospects and exposure
  • +Versatile and specialized programs
  • +Encouraging and supportive faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and campus environment
  • +Excellent professors and industry-relevant curriculum
  • +High-quality research facilities and opportunities
  • +Strong academic reputation and campus environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic foundation and multi-specialty exposure
  • +Good preparation for professional growth
  • +Kind and approachable professors
  • +Good study environment
  • +Well-designed marketing and business programmes
Cons
  • -Strict, overly disciplined environment with limited freedom and scope for innovation.
  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of practical relevance make it a poor academic experience.
  • -Poor management and administrative issues lead to student frustration and feelings of being misled.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Poor communication and disorganized administration.
  • -Limited career support and networking opportunities.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Poor administrative and management support.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum quality.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of clear communication and organization.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners positive feedback across multiple aspects, with Internationality emerging as its strongest suit at 3.83. Facilities also score well at 3.79. Areas like Value and Professors are rated a solid 3.72. Student Life and Location are closely behind, both above 3.65. The most significant area for improvement appears to be Accomodation, receiving the lowest rating of 3.03.

This institution receives high marks for its professors and location, with ratings of 4.6 and approximately 4.57 respectively. Student life and internationality also score well, both around 4.13. Facilities are rated at a solid 4. The weakest area is accommodation, which scores 3.47, indicating room for improvement in this aspect.

This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly excelling in its professors, location, and perceived value, all achieving a perfect 5. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded at 4.5 and 4.25 respectively. The facilities are rated highly at 4.75, while accommodation, at 4.25, represents the lowest score, though still very positive.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution presents a well-rounded profile, with its strongest areas being **Professors** and **Value**, both receiving a commendable rating of 4. Conversely, **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, **Accommodation**, and **Internationality** are rated at a solid 3, indicating satisfactory but not exceptional performance across these aspects.

This institution demonstrates strong internationality, receiving a perfect 5 out of 5. Key areas like facilities, professors, and student life are also well-regarded with 4-star ratings. However, the university's location and accommodation received a more moderate score of 3 stars, suggesting these aspects could be areas for development. Overall value is rated positively at 4 stars.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting structured academics, campus life, and personal development. Around 17% of feedback is negative, citing strictness, outdated curriculum, and management issues.

Students highly praise the university, with ~93% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.47/5. Recurring themes include excellent professors, varied courses, and a beautiful campus with ample facilities. Accommodation costs are noted as expensive.

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise brilliant professors, industry-relevant curriculum, excellent research facilities, and engaging technical events.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university receives a positive reception, with ~100% of feedback being favorable. Students highlight a solid academic foundation and broad specialty exposure. Career guidance is noted as an area with potential for improvement.

The single review is positive, rating the university 4/5. It praises kind professors but notes concerns about litter and difficult travel due to location.

Rating distribution
5★
17%
53%
75%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
57%
40%
25%
0%
0%
100%
100%
3★
10%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close