Braunschweig University of Technology vs Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University vs ArtCenter College of Design vs Odessa National Polytechnic University - ONPU vs Odesa State Economic University
Side-by-side comparison from 7 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Structured curriculum and diverse community
- +Ample learning spaces and resources
- +Foundational science education
- +Excellent teaching and materials
- +Desire for modern teaching methods and staff
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated curriculum and lack of willingness to improve it are major concerns.
- -Poor communication and disorganization from the university administration are frequent issues.
- -Facilities are often described as very old and in poor condition.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With standout scores in Internationality (4.425) and Location (4.175), the university demonstrates particular strengths in its global appeal and setting. Professors also received a commendable rating of 4. However, Facilities received the lowest score at 3.425, indicating an area for potential improvement. Other aspects like Student Life and Accomodation fall within a generally positive range.
The university shows a mixed performance, excelling in location and value, both receiving 3.67. Student life is rated a solid 3. In contrast, internationality is the lowest-rated area at 2, with facilities and accommodation also scoring a low 2.33. Professors are rated moderately at 2.67.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 3.75 average rating and no negative feedback, university student reviews are largely positive. Students highlight knowledgeable and supportive professors, a well-structured curriculum, and a diverse community. Some mention administrative slowness and outdated facilities needing remodeling.
With a 2.67 average rating, roughly 33% of reviews are negative, citing outdated curriculum and teaching methods. One positive review highlights excellent fundamental science education but notes a lack of modern teaching approaches.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show