Universidad de Palermo - UP vs Universidad del Salvador - USAL vs Universidad Abierta Interamericana - UAI vs San Martin National University - UNSAM vs Catholic University of Salta - UCASAL

Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: San Martin National University - UNSAM (4.90)
Universidad de Palermo - UP: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad del Salvador - USAL: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Abierta Interamericana - UAI: wins 5/6 categories
San Martin National University - UNSAM: wins 1/6 categories
Catholic University of Salta - UCASAL: wins 0/6 categories
Instituto Superior de Formación Docente N°41: wins 0/6 categories
National University Tres de Febrero - UNTREF: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Buenos Aires, Argentina
4.30
Read more reviews
13 reviews
×
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Audiovisual Communication
Best programme: Government and International Relations
Best programme: Bachelor of International Studies
Best programme: Education Studies and English
Best programme: Arts and Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
4.40
3.33
5.00
Win
4.29
Not rated
2.00
4.00
Location
3.80
3.67
5.00
Win
4.43
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Professors
4.20
4.00
5.00
Win
4.71
4.00
4.00
4.00
Internationality
3.80
3.33
5.00
Win
4.86
3.00
3.00
3.00
Student life
4.60
4.00
4.00
4.71
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Value
3.80
4.67
5.00
4.71
5.00
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.80
2.33
5.00
Win
3.14
Not rated
2.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Flexible study options and personalized learning paths
  • +High-quality professors with real-world experience
  • +Practical, project-based learning and career support
  • +Highly qualified and supportive teachers
  • +Comprehensive and broad program curriculum
  • +Positive and well-structured learning environment
  • +Accessible and career-focused with internship/work opportunities
  • +Supportive environment for academic and career guidance
  • +Wide range of specialization options
  • +Modern campus and well-equipped facilities
  • +High-quality, progressive academic programs and updated curriculum
  • +Supportive and professional faculty and staff
  • +Extensive virtual and campus network
  • +Pioneer in distance education
  • +Dedicated and supportive teachers
  • +Balanced theory and practice in challenging classes
  • +Warm and respectful environment
  • +Specialized and innovative programs, especially in art, technology, health, and environment.
  • +Excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty.
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of engagement from instructors and insufficient course relevance are common complaints.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a persistent problem.
  • -Ineffective administrative and management support creates significant frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsive administration create frustration.
  • -Lack of clear academic support and guidance leaves students feeling lost.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant issue.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
  • -A perceived lack of support and engagement from instructors is common.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, scoring a high 4.6, and facilities, rated at 4.4. Conversely, location, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a moderate 3.8, indicating areas for potential improvement. The academic side is well-regarded, with professors achieving a solid 4.2. Overall, the university offers a good experience, particularly in its campus resources and social environment.

This institution presents a well-rounded profile, excelling particularly in **Value**, which received the highest rating. **Professors** and **Student Life** also scored strongly, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, suggesting it may be an area for improvement. **Facilities** and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, while **Location** is rated moderately well.

This institution garners excellent scores across most aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. Student life is the sole area receiving a slightly lower, yet still strong, rating of 4.

An assessment of the university reveals a highly international environment, with a near-perfect score for Internationality. Professors, Student Life, and Value also received excellent ratings. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Facilities are rated well, but not exceptionally.

Examining the university's performance reveals a clear dichotomy in its strengths and weaknesses. Professors are highly rated, earning a score of 4, indicating a strong academic core. Conversely, facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received a score of 0, suggesting significant areas needing considerable improvement. The university shows moderate internationality (3) and excels in terms of value for money, with a perfect score of 5.

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors**, **location**, and **student life**, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, the **facilities** and **accommodation** stand out as areas requiring significant improvement, both scoring a low 2. Internationality is moderately rated at 3, and the overall **value** is considered strong at 4.

This institution garners solid marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a score of 4. The university also scores well in **Value**, mirroring these strengths. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3. The **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, receiving a score of 2, indicating potential room for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~77% of reviews rating it 4–5 stars and an average of 4.31/5. Students praise flexible study plans, project-based learning, and excellent professors. No negative feedback was reported.

Students praise remarkable teachers, well-organized information, and a broad, holistic program. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a supportive learning environment and a balanced approach, with minor drawbacks noted on course availability and virtual options.

With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of reviews are positive, highlighting accessible career paths and helpful staff. The remaining ~33% of feedback is not negative.

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the modern campus, well-equipped facilities, updated curriculum, and professional faculty. They also highlight progressive programs, student well-being initiatives, and opportunities for career development.

With an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviewers highlight the university's strong virtual learning environments and organized remote education system.

With a 4/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight well-prepared, dedicated teachers and a warm, respectful environment. Some mention the building needs improvement.

The university receives positive feedback (~100%) for its strong infrastructure, qualified faculty, and innovative, specialized programs. One review highlighted unique offerings in art, technology, health, and environmental studies.

Rating distribution
5★
54%
67%
33%
86%
0%
0%
0%
4★
23%
33%
33%
14%
100%
100%
100%
3★
23%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close