Simon Fraser University vs University Canada West - UCW vs Thompson Rivers University - TRU vs Humber College vs Kwantlen Polytechnic University - KPU
Side-by-side comparison from 273 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and supportive professors
- +Academically rigorous and challenging curriculum
- +Diverse program options and experiential learning opportunities
- +Practical, career-focused programs with experienced faculty
- +Affordable tuition and internationally recognized certifications
- +Diverse and well-structured learning environment
- +Small class sizes and supportive professors
- +Valuable courses for personal and professional growth
- +Great campus environment and opportunities
- +Practical, real-world career preparation
- +Supportive and industry-experienced faculty
- +Excellent balance of hands-on and theoretical learning
- +Practical, hands-on learning and real-world applications
- +Supportive and approachable instructors with clear explanations
- +Excellent facilities and opportunities for engagement
- +Practical, career-oriented programs with industry software
- +High-quality instructors and engaging, interactive learning environments
- +Abundant student resources for academic success
- +Flexible pacing and online learning
- +Supportive instructors and helpful feedback
- -Poor organization and course management.
- -Negative atmosphere and unpleasant experience.
- -Unsubtle propaganda in non-science courses.
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in poor condition.
- -Communication from the institution is perceived as lacking or unclear.
- -Outdated facilities and poor parking are prevalent issues.
- -Course registration leads to encountering subpar professors.
- -Housing in the area is considered overpriced.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication regarding important deadlines.
- -Lack of support and understanding from professors and administration regarding student circumstances.
- -Perceived disregard for student well-being and financial concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of resources and support are common complaints.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum is often described as irrelevant or not engaging.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as uninspiring or irrelevant.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in internationality, with a score of 4.22, and professors, rated at 4.14. Value for money also received a positive assessment at 4.07. Conversely, student life emerged as the lowest-scoring area at 3.54, with accommodation and location also receiving moderate ratings. Facilities also received a decent score of 3.90.
This institution receives excellent marks in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location** (4.51) and **Internationality** (4.36). **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value** also score positively, all above 4.1. The primary area for improvement seems to be **Accomodation**, which received a significantly lower rating of 3.35 compared to the other metrics.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings across several key areas. Professors and value for money stand out with the highest scores, closely followed by location and internationality. Student life also received a solid mark. The weakest areas, while still respectable, appear to be accommodation and facilities, which received the lowest scores among the surveyed categories.
Overall, this institution garners positive feedback across multiple aspects. Internationality stands out as its strongest area, achieving the highest rating. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other highly-rated categories include facilities, location, and professors, while student life and value also received favorable, though slightly lower, marks.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in academic areas, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.42 and Internationality also scoring well at 4.32. Facilities and Location are similarly well-regarded. Student Life and Accommodations, however, present areas for potential improvement, with ratings of 3.94 and 3.44 respectively. Overall value is rated at a solid 4.0.
A consistently positive assessment emerges for this institution, with its **Professors** earning an exceptional 4.875. **Location** and **Internationality** also score highly, reflecting strengths in these aspects. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.125, indicating an area for potential improvement, while **Facilities** are rated moderately. Student life and value perceptions are solid.
This institution excels in several key areas, with top marks awarded for Location, Internationality, and Value. Student Life and Facilities received more moderate scores, suggesting areas for potential improvement. The university also demonstrates strong performance in Professors and Accomodation, indicating a generally well-rounded educational experience.
Approximately 98.6% of 72 reviews are positive, praising strong academics, good professors, and diverse program options like co-op. One review cited poor organization and atmosphere.
With a high average rating of 4.16/5, ~84% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical programs, experienced professors, and a diverse environment. No negative feedback was provided.
Most reviews praise valuable courses, small class sizes, and helpful professors. Approximately 6.7% of feedback was negative, mentioning worn facilities and parking issues.
Approximately 74% of reviews highlight practical, real-world learning and supportive, industry-experienced professors. A small portion (~3.1%) express dissatisfaction with administrative communication and professor understanding.
Most students find the university's practical, hands-on learning and supportive professors highly beneficial. Excellent facilities and career-focused courses are frequently praised. There is no reported negative feedback.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, career-oriented programs and experienced, helpful instructors. No negative feedback was provided.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive (100% positive sentiment). Students appreciate the flexibility of self-paced learning and the option to work on schoolwork alongside other commitments.
Nothing to show
You can study and get a degree here, but the university in itself cares little about students and does very little to help when needed. Guidelines are very vague and facilities are not built for as many students as are accepted.
Each professor that I have had so far was extremely encouraging and was often willing to go the extra step to make sure I understood the course content. The professors I could tell were very tenured and loved their roles. This helped me to foster even more of a passion for sociology, and I would highly recommend students take at least one course because the experience is quite interesting.
Truly, Humber College will always be an educational institute that I will recommend to family and friends. The reason for this is because they put students first, and hire professors who are professionals in the field they are teaching. I graduated from the Child and Youth Care program in 2018, and really appreciated the fact that my professors were Youth Workers themselves. This allowed me to gain field knowledge, and experienced education. Furthermore, the campus is clean, safe and full of fun activities year round. All in all, Humber College was a great experience for me from 2015-2018.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show