RMIT University vs Swinburne University of Technology vs Torrens University Australia vs Monash University vs Victoria University
Side-by-side comparison from 245 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and industry-focused learning
- +Real-world experience from professors
- +Engaging and relevant coursework
- +Comprehensive curriculum with practical skills emphasis
- +High-quality teaching and supportive instructors
- +Opportunities for electives, exchange programs, and work-integrated learning
- +Engaging and interactive classes with knowledgeable and passionate professors
- +Flexible learning options catering to working students
- +Practical, real-world experience emphasized
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty
- +Excellent facilities and modern campus environment
- +Diverse community and valuable personal development opportunities
- +Engaging online lectures and flexible learning options
- +Supportive lecturers and strong networking opportunities
- +Convenient campus location and quiet study spaces
- +Helpful and friendly staff and teachers
- +Great facilities and resources
- +Career advancement opportunities
- +Life-changing educational experience and career readiness
- +Supportive community and valuable peer connections
- +Excellent study environment and resources
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant student frustration and lack of support.
- -Industrial action negatively impacts students with delayed feedback and limited staff assistance.
- -Teachers are unhelpful and actively work against students' success.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues like course changes and unclear enrollment practices.
- -High costs and questionable value for money regarding tuition fees.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching staff and potentially rude or untrained facilitators.
- -Lack of practical, industry-relevant learning and underwhelming course content.
- -Insufficient career opportunities and support services.
- -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Limited course variety and a disconnect between curriculum and real-world application are also noted.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support leads to feeling overlooked.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
- -The curriculum is perceived as unengaging and disconnected from real-world applications.
Professors stand out as the university's strongest asset, earning a stellar 4.477 rating. Facilities and Value also received favorable scores above 4.2. The lowest-rated aspect, however, is Accommodation, coming in at 3.886. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid reputation, particularly in its academic and financial offerings.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both scoring exceptionally high. Its **Facilities** and **Value** also receive very positive marks. The **Accomodation** category, however, stands out as the lowest-rated aspect, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with particular advantages in global reach and its physical setting.
This institution demonstrates strengths in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, **Student Life** stands out as the area requiring the most attention, with the lowest score. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value are rated similarly and fall in the mid-range. Accomodation and Internationality also received respectable, though slightly lower, scores compared to the strongest category.
Remarkably high marks were achieved in several areas, with Internationality (4.49) and Professors (4.48) standing out as the strongest aspects. Facilities also scored well at 4.35. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the lowest-rated category at 3.74. The university also received solid scores for Student Life (4.16), Location (4.08), and Value (4.25), indicating a generally positive, though not uniformly exceptional, student experience.
This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance, particularly excelling in **Internationality** and **Value**, both scoring a high 4.29. **Location** and **Accomodation** also received favorable ratings around 4.1. The **Professors** were rated positively at 4.11. **Facilities** earned a solid score of 4. **Student Life** emerged as the relatively weakest area, with a rating of 3.82.
This institution garners impressive scores across multiple aspects, notably excelling in its Professors, Internationality, and Value, all receiving a strong 4.33. Student Life, Accommodation, and Location also score well at 4. While the university demonstrates considerable strengths, its Facilities, at 3.67, represent its lowest-rated area.
This institution receives outstanding marks across the board, with perfect scores awarded for facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Its only slight deviation from a perfect score is in location, which still garners a very respectable rating. The university's strengths are clearly in its comprehensive offerings and student experience.
Approximately 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-focused learning and experienced faculty. A small percentage (~3%) mention administrative issues and industrial action impacting studies.
Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting comprehensive curriculum, good teaching quality, and diverse electives. A small percentage of feedback expressed concerns about faculty.
~63% of reviews are positive, praising flexible learning, passionate professors, and engaging classes. ~37.5% of feedback is negative, citing course changes and high costs.
The university garners high praise, with ~96% positive reviews. Students highlight knowledgeable faculty, modern facilities, and diverse programs. A small percentage (~3.4%) mentioned concerns about cost-cutting and less practical learning experiences.
With a 4.29/5 average rating from 28 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and engaging online sessions. The block study method and flexible attendance are also highlighted as beneficial.
With all 3 reviews being positive (100%), students highlight great facilities, helpful teachers, and a positive university culture. The average rating is an excellent 4.67 out of 5.
With an average rating of 5/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight life-changing experiences, strong support systems, quality education, and career readiness. They also appreciate university events, study spaces, and library resources.
Unfortunately, I had to go to RMIT University in Australia, and I have to admit that it was the most disappointing and unpleasant experience of my life. It was immediately apparent that this establishment was not at all what it purported to be—a prominent university. First and foremost, dealing with the RMIT administration is a complete headache. They are uncoordinated, unresponsive, and don't appear to care about genuinely assisting kids in succeeding. I had to wait weeks for a simple inquiry to be resolved, and even then, the answers I got were sometimes wrong or conflicting. The quality of education at RMIT is also severely lacking. Many of the professors are disinterested and seem to have no real passion for teaching. The curriculum is outdated, and the coursework often feels irrelevant to real-world applications. It's clear that the university is more concerned with making a profit than actually providing a quality education. The facilities at RMIT are in a sorry state as well. The classrooms are cramped and outdated, and the library is sorely lacking in resources. It's as if the university is stuck in the past and has no interest in investing in modern facilities for its students. Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of my time at RMIT was the lack of support for students. There is a complete lack of career services and guidance for students looking to enter the job market. It's as if the university expects you to figure it all out on your own. In summary, I would strongly advise anyone considering RMIT University in Australia to think twice. The administration is a mess, the education is subpar, and the lack of support for students is disheartening. Save yourself the time, money, and frustration and look elsewhere for your education.
They are thugs. Don't ever go to them. The teachers are part of the cartel who do not help students to let them fail and earn millions of dollars. Infrastructure is the best but the teachers are the worst.
I want to share my experience with Torrens University. They initially gave me an offer letter and Confirmation of Enrollment (COE), but after I had been in the course for a year, they changed the name of the course and added more subjects to my study plan. It really feels like Torrens is using this format to make more money from students. This kind of practice is frustrating and makes it hard for us to plan our studies effectively.
The degree matched its expectation and was in line with goals set before starting the degree. The most important aspect of the degree was to build the latest skills in my domain and be able to interact with the industry. Both of these were well provided by the university. Would definitely recommend it to others.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
