Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina - UCA vs Universidad del Cema - UCEMA vs Universidad Nacional de la Matanza - UNLAM vs Universidad Favaloro vs Universidad Nacional de Lanus - UNLA

Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina - UCA: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad del Cema - UCEMA: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Nacional de la Matanza - UNLAM: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Favaloro: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Nacional de Lanus - UNLA: wins 4/4 categories
National University Tres de Febrero - UNTREF: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Buenos Aires, Argentina
5.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Industrial and Production Engineering
Best programme: B.A. in Philosophy
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Education
Best programme: Arts and Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
4.50
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Location
3.67
4.50
5.00
Not rated
5.00
3.00
Professors
4.25
4.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Internationality
4.13
5.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
3.00
Student life
4.33
4.50
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Value
4.63
4.50
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Accommodation
4.50
4.50
1.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, real-world application of learning
  • +Supportive staff and comfortable facilities
  • +High-quality education and valuable peer connections
  • +World-class faculty with practical, real-world experience
  • +High-quality education encouraging critical thinking and idea generation
  • +Excellent value for money
  • +Supportive and active campus environment
  • +High-quality faculty and resources
  • +Well-equipped facilities for learning

Nothing to show

  • +Beautiful, well-maintained campus
  • +Professional, dedicated teachers
  • +Enriching, supportive learning environment
  • +Specialized and innovative programs, especially in art, technology, health, and environment.
  • +Excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and engagement from instructors is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues are frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a problem.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant issue.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
  • -A perceived lack of support and engagement from instructors is common.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in accommodation, receiving a high rating of 4.5, and particularly excels in value for money, scoring an impressive 4.625. Student life also garners exceptional feedback at 4.33. Conversely, the location presents the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.67, indicating room for improvement in this area compared to its other well-regarded features.

With an outstanding perfect score in Internationality, this institution truly shines in its global engagement. High ratings also highlight its excellent Facilities, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value, all scoring a strong 4.5. The only area receiving a slightly lower, though still positive, score is its Professors, at 4.

This institution receives excellent marks for its **professors, location, and internationality**, all scoring a perfect 5. Student life and value are also well-regarded with 4s. However, the university's **accommodation** is a significant weakness, rated only 1. Facilities are considered average at 3.

Nothing to show

This institution garners outstanding marks across all assessed criteria. Its strengths are evident in consistently perfect scores for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. No specific weaknesses are identified within these ratings, indicating a uniformly excellent student experience.

This institution garners solid marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a score of 4. The university also scores well in **Value**, mirroring these strengths. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3. The **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, receiving a score of 2, indicating potential room for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students value the concrete teaching approach combining theory and practical application, excellent curricular level, and supportive staff and peers.

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight world-class faculty with practical experience, accessibility of virtual classes, and excellent value for money.

With a 4.5/5 average rating from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight excellent teachers, equipped facilities, and a student-friendly campus environment. A minor parking inconvenience was noted.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, feedback is exclusively positive. Students highlight the beautiful campus and highly professional, dedicated teachers. Negative reviews are non-existent.

The university receives positive feedback (~100%) for its strong infrastructure, qualified faculty, and innovative, specialized programs. One review highlighted unique offerings in art, technology, health, and environmental studies.

Rating distribution
5★
36%
100%
50%
0%
100%
0%
4★
64%
0%
50%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close