Universidad Argentina de la Empresa - UADE vs Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina - UCA vs Universidad del Salvador - USAL vs Universidad de Belgrano - UB vs National University of Mar del Plata

Side-by-side comparison from 33 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Argentina de la Empresa - UADE: wins 3/7 categories
Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina - UCA: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad del Salvador - USAL: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de Belgrano - UB: wins 0/7 categories
National University of Mar del Plata: wins 0/7 categories
Catholic University of Salta - UCASAL: wins 4/7 categories
National University Tres de Febrero - UNTREF: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Psychology
Buenos Aires, Argentina
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing and Communications
Best programme: Accounting Technician
Best programme: Bachelor of International Studies
Best programme: Arts and Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
4.75
4.25
3.33
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Location
4.75
3.67
3.67
4.50
4.33
5.00
Win
3.00
Professors
4.50
Win
4.25
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
Internationality
4.63
Win
4.13
3.33
3.00
3.67
3.50
3.00
Student life
4.63
Win
4.33
4.00
3.00
4.33
4.00
4.00
Value
4.75
4.63
4.67
3.50
4.33
5.00
Win
4.00
Accommodation
4.75
4.50
2.33
3.50
4.33
5.00
Win
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent support and resources
  • +Modern and well-equipped facilities
  • +Practical experience and industry connections
  • +Practical, real-world application of learning
  • +Supportive staff and comfortable facilities
  • +High-quality education and valuable peer connections
  • +Highly qualified and supportive teachers
  • +Comprehensive and broad program curriculum
  • +Positive and well-structured learning environment
  • +Academic validity and expert tutors
  • +Modern and accessible facilities
  • +Efficient and time-optimizing programs
  • +Comprehensive curriculum with strong theoretical and practical foundation
  • +Supportive faculty and valuable real-world experience through practicums/assistantships
  • +Dynamic and diverse learning environment with helpful, analytical teachers
  • +Updated and relevant program content
  • +Supportive and accessible faculty
  • +Well-resourced library and effective virtual learning environment
  • +Specialized and innovative programs, especially in art, technology, health, and environment.
  • +Excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a persistent problem.
  • -Ineffective administrative and management support creates significant frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution is a major concern.
  • -Limited student diversity and broader university experience.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency frustrates students.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant issue.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
  • -A perceived lack of support and engagement from instructors is common.
Rating summary
What students say

Impressively high marks distinguish this university across most aspects of student experience. Facilities, location, accommodation, and value are particularly strong, all receiving a near-perfect 4.75. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded at 4.625. Professors are rated highly at 4.5, representing the most moderate score within this excellent overall assessment.

This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in accommodation, receiving a high rating of 4.5, and particularly excels in value for money, scoring an impressive 4.625. Student life also garners exceptional feedback at 4.33. Conversely, the location presents the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.67, indicating room for improvement in this area compared to its other well-regarded features.

This institution presents a well-rounded profile, excelling particularly in **Value**, which received the highest rating. **Professors** and **Student Life** also scored strongly, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, suggesting it may be an area for improvement. **Facilities** and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, while **Location** is rated moderately well.

The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with **location** standing out as its strongest asset at 4.5. Facilities and professors also received favorable marks of 4. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas for potential improvement, both scoring 3. Accommodations and value for money are rated moderately at 3.5.

This institution garners strong reviews, particularly excelling in student life, accommodation, location, and value, all receiving a high 4.33. Facilities and professors also score well with a solid 4. A notable area for improvement is internationality, which received the lowest rating of 3.67, suggesting a potential focus for development.

This institution achieves excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, location, and accommodation all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional quality. Student life and professors are also highly rated. The weakest aspect appears to be internationality, with a score of 3.5. Overall, the university presents a strong offering, particularly in its physical resources and accessibility, with excellent perceived value.

This institution garners solid marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a score of 4. The university also scores well in **Value**, mirroring these strengths. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3. The **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, receiving a score of 2, indicating potential room for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~91% of reviews are positive. Students praise excellent education, supportive staff, modern campus facilities, and career opportunities. No negative feedback was received.

All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students value the concrete teaching approach combining theory and practical application, excellent curricular level, and supportive staff and peers.

Students praise remarkable teachers, well-organized information, and a broad, holistic program. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a supportive learning environment and a balanced approach, with minor drawbacks noted on course availability and virtual options.

Reviews are split, with 1 positive and 1 negative comment. Positive feedback highlights academic quality, tutors, and efficiency. Negative comments mention a lack of diverse student interaction due to small class sizes.

All 3 reviews were positive, resulting in an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted comprehensive curriculum, supportive faculty, and valuable real-world experience, with only minor mentions of areas for practice improvement.

With a 4.5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students highlight the updated program content focusing on new technologies and media. They praise excellent professor support and quick assignment feedback, alongside an extensive library.

The university receives positive feedback (~100%) for its strong infrastructure, qualified faculty, and innovative, specialized programs. One review highlighted unique offerings in art, technology, health, and environmental studies.

Rating distribution
5★
45%
36%
67%
0%
67%
50%
0%
4★
27%
64%
33%
50%
33%
50%
100%
3★
27%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close