Viva College vs Curtin University vs RMIT University vs Torrens University Australia vs Central Queensland University
Side-by-side comparison from 164 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +Practical, hands-on learning and skill development
- +Industry-relevant curriculum and experienced faculty
- +Strong global reputation and graduate employment satisfaction
- +Practical and industry-focused learning
- +Real-world experience from professors
- +Engaging and relevant coursework
- +Engaging and interactive classes with knowledgeable and passionate professors
- +Flexible learning options catering to working students
- +Practical, real-world experience emphasized
- +Adaptable and supportive learning options
- +Helpful student support services and lecturers
- +Practical learning experience and facilities
- +Supportive environment and accessible, expert faculty.
- +Real-world relevant assignments and hands-on learning.
- +Welcoming campus and diverse opportunities for growth.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Inefficient and unhelpful administrative processes.
- -Lack of engagement and poor communication from instructors.
- -Outdated resources and uninspiring learning environments.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant student frustration and lack of support.
- -Industrial action negatively impacts students with delayed feedback and limited staff assistance.
- -Administrative and management issues like course changes and unclear enrollment practices.
- -High costs and questionable value for money regarding tuition fees.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching staff and potentially rude or untrained facilitators.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a problem.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty are significant concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication create frustration.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution receives high marks in several key areas, with **Facilities** and **Value** standing out as its strongest performers. **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Professors** also earned very positive reviews. The university's **Location** is rated well, though not as highly as its top-scoring categories. **Accommodations** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects, indicating a potential area for improvement.
Professors stand out as the university's strongest asset, earning a stellar 4.477 rating. Facilities and Value also received favorable scores above 4.2. The lowest-rated aspect, however, is Accommodation, coming in at 3.886. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid reputation, particularly in its academic and financial offerings.
This institution demonstrates strengths in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, **Student Life** stands out as the area requiring the most attention, with the lowest score. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value are rated similarly and fall in the mid-range. Accomodation and Internationality also received respectable, though slightly lower, scores compared to the strongest category.
Exceptional ratings highlight the university's strengths in Location (4.83) and Internationality (4.63), reflecting positive student experiences in these areas. Student Life (4.5) and Facilities (4.43) also score highly. Conversely, Value (4.0) received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories, indicating a potential area for improvement.
This institution demonstrates excellent performance in several key areas. Professors and location received exceptionally high scores, closely followed by facilities and value. Student life and internationality also scored well. However, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, receiving a notably lower rating compared to other aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~92% of feedback), with students praising experienced faculty and practical, industry-relevant curriculum. There is minimal negative feedback.
Approximately 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-focused learning and experienced faculty. A small percentage (~3%) mention administrative issues and industrial action impacting studies.
~63% of reviews are positive, praising flexible learning, passionate professors, and engaging classes. ~37.5% of feedback is negative, citing course changes and high costs.
With an average rating of 4.13/5 from 8 reviews, students report high satisfaction with supportive learning options and helpful staff. All feedback received was positive.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, averaging 4.54/5 from 13 feedback entries. Students highlight supportive faculties, practical/real-world assignments, and convenient campus locations with modern facilities. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Curtin University is greta for those who are very "career-centric"; the university itself places great emphasis on how to find internships and jobs and are very supportive in that regard. The university is also one that places importance on social networking, whether that be through clubs, discord servers and affordable or free social events. One thing I do dislike however is the disorganisation in some courses or how little spaces there can be for classes (this might be specific to my major/course though). Overall I have enjoyed my time here so far.
Unfortunately, I had to go to RMIT University in Australia, and I have to admit that it was the most disappointing and unpleasant experience of my life. It was immediately apparent that this establishment was not at all what it purported to be—a prominent university. First and foremost, dealing with the RMIT administration is a complete headache. They are uncoordinated, unresponsive, and don't appear to care about genuinely assisting kids in succeeding. I had to wait weeks for a simple inquiry to be resolved, and even then, the answers I got were sometimes wrong or conflicting. The quality of education at RMIT is also severely lacking. Many of the professors are disinterested and seem to have no real passion for teaching. The curriculum is outdated, and the coursework often feels irrelevant to real-world applications. It's clear that the university is more concerned with making a profit than actually providing a quality education. The facilities at RMIT are in a sorry state as well. The classrooms are cramped and outdated, and the library is sorely lacking in resources. It's as if the university is stuck in the past and has no interest in investing in modern facilities for its students. Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of my time at RMIT was the lack of support for students. There is a complete lack of career services and guidance for students looking to enter the job market. It's as if the university expects you to figure it all out on your own. In summary, I would strongly advise anyone considering RMIT University in Australia to think twice. The administration is a mess, the education is subpar, and the lack of support for students is disheartening. Save yourself the time, money, and frustration and look elsewhere for your education.
I want to share my experience with Torrens University. They initially gave me an offer letter and Confirmation of Enrollment (COE), but after I had been in the course for a year, they changed the name of the course and added more subjects to my study plan. It really feels like Torrens is using this format to make more money from students. This kind of practice is frustrating and makes it hard for us to plan our studies effectively.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
