Universidad de Palermo - UP vs Universidad Argentina de la Empresa - UADE vs Universidad del Cema - UCEMA vs IES LV "Juan Ramón Fernández" - LV vs National University of Mar del Plata

Side-by-side comparison from 31 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad del Cema - UCEMA (5.00)
Universidad de Palermo - UP: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Argentina de la Empresa - UADE: wins 6/7 categories
Universidad del Cema - UCEMA: wins 1/7 categories
IES LV "Juan Ramón Fernández" - LV: wins 0/7 categories
National University of Mar del Plata: wins 0/7 categories
Torcuato Di Tella University - UTDT: wins 0/7 categories
National University Tres de Febrero - UNTREF: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Buenos Aires, Argentina
4.30
Read more reviews
13 reviews
×
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Buenos Aires, Argentina
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Industrial and Production Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting Technician
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Arts and Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
4.40
4.75
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Location
3.80
4.75
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
3.00
Professors
4.20
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
3.80
4.63
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.60
4.63
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
4.00
Value
3.80
4.75
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.80
4.75
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Flexible study options and personalized learning paths
  • +High-quality professors with real-world experience
  • +Practical, project-based learning and career support
  • +Excellent support and resources
  • +Modern and well-equipped facilities
  • +Practical experience and industry connections
  • +World-class faculty with practical, real-world experience
  • +High-quality education encouraging critical thinking and idea generation
  • +Excellent value for money

Nothing to show

  • +Comprehensive curriculum with strong theoretical and practical foundation
  • +Supportive faculty and valuable real-world experience through practicums/assistantships
  • +Dynamic and diverse learning environment with helpful, analytical teachers

Nothing to show

  • +Specialized and innovative programs, especially in art, technology, health, and environment.
  • +Excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty.
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of engagement from instructors and insufficient course relevance are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant issue.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
  • -A perceived lack of support and engagement from instructors is common.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, scoring a high 4.6, and facilities, rated at 4.4. Conversely, location, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a moderate 3.8, indicating areas for potential improvement. The academic side is well-regarded, with professors achieving a solid 4.2. Overall, the university offers a good experience, particularly in its campus resources and social environment.

Impressively high marks distinguish this university across most aspects of student experience. Facilities, location, accommodation, and value are particularly strong, all receiving a near-perfect 4.75. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded at 4.625. Professors are rated highly at 4.5, representing the most moderate score within this excellent overall assessment.

With an outstanding perfect score in Internationality, this institution truly shines in its global engagement. High ratings also highlight its excellent Facilities, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value, all scoring a strong 4.5. The only area receiving a slightly lower, though still positive, score is its Professors, at 4.

Nothing to show

This institution garners strong reviews, particularly excelling in student life, accommodation, location, and value, all receiving a high 4.33. Facilities and professors also score well with a solid 4. A notable area for improvement is internationality, which received the lowest rating of 3.67, suggesting a potential focus for development.

Nothing to show

This institution garners solid marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a score of 4. The university also scores well in **Value**, mirroring these strengths. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3. The **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, receiving a score of 2, indicating potential room for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~77% of reviews rating it 4–5 stars and an average of 4.31/5. Students praise flexible study plans, project-based learning, and excellent professors. No negative feedback was reported.

With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~91% of reviews are positive. Students praise excellent education, supportive staff, modern campus facilities, and career opportunities. No negative feedback was received.

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight world-class faculty with practical experience, accessibility of virtual classes, and excellent value for money.

Nothing to show

All 3 reviews were positive, resulting in an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted comprehensive curriculum, supportive faculty, and valuable real-world experience, with only minor mentions of areas for practice improvement.

Nothing to show

The university receives positive feedback (~100%) for its strong infrastructure, qualified faculty, and innovative, specialized programs. One review highlighted unique offerings in art, technology, health, and environmental studies.

Rating distribution
5★
54%
45%
100%
0%
67%
0%
0%
4★
23%
27%
0%
0%
33%
0%
100%
3★
23%
27%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close