Universidad EAFIT vs Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB vs Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC vs Institución Universitaria Colegio Mayor de Antioquia vs Universidad de Medellín - UDEM

Side-by-side comparison from 39 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB (5.00)
Universidad EAFIT: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC: wins 2/7 categories
Institución Universitaria Colegio Mayor de Antioquia: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de Medellín - UDEM: wins 2/7 categories
Escuela de Aviación - INEC: wins 0/7 categories
Catholic University Luis Amigo: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Medellin, Colombia
4.80
Read more reviews
23 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Entrepreneurship
Best programme: General Medicine
Best programme: Accounting
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.89
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.40
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.88
Win
4.00
4.50
Not rated
4.60
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.58
4.00
4.63
Win
Not rated
4.60
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.63
5.00
Win
3.88
Not rated
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.89
4.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.42
2.00
4.63
Win
Not rated
4.40
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.77
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.80
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Career support and growth opportunities
  • +High-quality education with excellent teachers and facilities
  • +Adaptable methodology and innovative entrepreneurship focus
  • +High academic quality and relevant programs
  • +Strong English language focus
  • +Blend of nature and academic facilities
  • +Strong social and community focus
  • +Early patient contact and practical skill development
  • +Student voice and equitable treatment

Nothing to show

  • +Strong practical application and access to professional equipment
  • +Excellent professors with industry experience
  • +High-quality facilities and innovative academic environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of communication and transparency from administration.
  • -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum delivery.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as inflexible or uninspiring.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
  • -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of administrative and management support.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful teaching quality.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution receives commendable ratings across multiple facets. Its strengths lie particularly in Facilities and Student Life, both scoring an impressive 4.89. Location also ranks highly at 4.88. While Accommodation and Internationality are also strong, the Value for money is rated lowest among the surveyed areas, though still at a solid 4.42. Professors also received a good score of 4.58.

Excelling in its facilities and international appeal, this institution garners top marks in those areas. Student life, professor quality, and location also receive strong positive feedback, indicating a well-rounded experience. However, the university's value for money is notably lower, standing out as its weakest aspect.

Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.

Nothing to show

This institution garners impressive scores across multiple facets. Student life stands out as a particular strength, receiving a perfect score. Accommodation also ranks highly. Conversely, internationality received the lowest rating, indicating an area for potential improvement. Other categories like facilities, professors, location, and value all received strong, positive evaluations.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.78/5, university students overwhelmingly praise the institution. Recurring themes highlight excellent support, career opportunities, and high-quality education. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students praise the university's strong academic quality, emphasis on English language education, and adaptation to labor needs. The natural campus environment and excellent facilities are also highlighted.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.

Nothing to show

All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.6/5 stars. Students highlight an inspiring academic environment, excellent facilities, and professors with industry experience. Practical application through projects and hands-on learning is frequently praised.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
83%
100%
56%
0%
60%
0%
0%
4★
13%
0%
44%
0%
40%
0%
0%
3★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close