Charles Sturt University vs Torrens University Australia vs Central Queensland University vs University of New South Wales vs University of New England

Side-by-side comparison from 105 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of New South Wales (4.40)
Charles Sturt University: wins 0/7 categories
Torrens University Australia: wins 0/7 categories
Central Queensland University: wins 4/7 categories
University of New South Wales: wins 2/7 categories
University of New England: wins 1/7 categories
Learning People: wins 0/7 categories
Australian Adult Learning Institute: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Aeronautical Engineering
Best programme: Hospitality Management
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
4.40
Top
Read more reviews
23 reviews
×
Best programme: Economics
Armidale, Australia
4.20
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business
Dublin, Ireland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.59
3.38
4.43
4.45
Win
4.45
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.77
3.63
4.83
Win
4.17
4.21
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.11
3.38
4.25
4.61
Win
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.76
3.50
4.63
Win
4.26
3.86
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.82
3.00
4.50
Win
4.35
4.29
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.93
3.38
4.00
4.09
4.29
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.73
3.17
4.38
Win
3.91
4.05
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging and diverse academic programs
  • +Positive campus environment and growth opportunities
  • +Engaging and interactive classes with knowledgeable and passionate professors
  • +Flexible learning options catering to working students
  • +Practical, real-world experience emphasized
  • +Adaptable and supportive learning options
  • +Helpful student support services and lecturers
  • +Practical learning experience and facilities
  • +Industry-connected academics and practical learning
  • +High-quality teaching and well-structured courses
  • +Modern, well-equipped campus facilities
  • +Flexible and accessible online learning options
  • +High-quality academic programs and experienced faculty
  • +Supportive student services and community focus

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of responsiveness from staff are significant complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues like course changes and unclear enrollment practices.
  • -High costs and questionable value for money regarding tuition fees.
  • -Inconsistent quality of teaching staff and potentially rude or untrained facilitators.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a problem.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty are significant concerns.
  • -Unclear communication and administrative inefficiencies hinder student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources detract from learning.
  • -Limited access to faculty support and unclear academic progression create frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates particular strength in its faculty, earning the highest rating for professors. Student life and value for money also received commendable scores. Conversely, facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect of the university experience, indicating an area for potential improvement. Other categories, including location, accommodation, and internationality, show solid, mid-range performance.

This institution demonstrates strengths in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, **Student Life** stands out as the area requiring the most attention, with the lowest score. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value are rated similarly and fall in the mid-range. Accomodation and Internationality also received respectable, though slightly lower, scores compared to the strongest category.

Exceptional ratings highlight the university's strengths in Location (4.83) and Internationality (4.63), reflecting positive student experiences in these areas. Student Life (4.5) and Facilities (4.43) also score highly. Conversely, Value (4.0) received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories, indicating a potential area for improvement.

Overall, this university receives solid ratings, particularly excelling in **Professors** with an impressive 4.61. The **Facilities** also score very well at 4.45. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score at 3.91, and **Value** at 4.09, suggesting these might be areas where students experienced less satisfaction compared to other aspects of their university experience.

This institution garners strong marks in several key areas, with Facilities being the standout at 4.45. Professors and Student Life also receive favorable scores, alongside a solid rating for Value. Conversely, Internationality presents the lowest rating at 3.86, indicating a potential area for growth. Accommodations and Location also fall slightly below the highest-rated aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 41 out of 45 reviews being positive, students praise knowledgeable professors and supportive faculty. They highlight growth opportunities, challenging curricula, and vibrant campus life. There is no negative feedback in the provided sample.

~63% of reviews are positive, praising flexible learning, passionate professors, and engaging classes. ~37.5% of feedback is negative, citing course changes and high costs.

With an average rating of 4.13/5 from 8 reviews, students report high satisfaction with supportive learning options and helpful staff. All feedback received was positive.

With ~100% positive sentiment from 23 reviews, students praise the excellent education, industry connections, and modern facilities. Some noted a lack of cultural diversity among the student body.

With a 4.24/5 average rating from 21 reviews, ~95% are positive. Students praise academic excellence, flexible remote/in-person options, and supportive faculty. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
7%
38%
13%
52%
29%
0%
0%
4★
84%
25%
88%
35%
67%
0%
0%
3★
9%
0%
0%
13%
5%
0%
0%
2★
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Torrens university

I want to share my experience with Torrens University. They initially gave me an offer letter and Confirmation of Enrollment (COE), but after I had been in the course for a year, they changed the name of the course and added more subjects to my study plan. It really feels like Torrens is using this format to make more money from students. This kind of practice is frustrating and makes it hard for us to plan our studies effectively.

Nothing to show

Master of Professional Accounting (Extension)

The UNSW is a great university, as an International student I would like to express the experience I had when Studying there. There are many international students who studied there, various students around the world are getting their degrees at UNSW. I like the experience as a students we met some experience people that is dealing with real life experience working in certain industry, they shared us some real life situation and how to handle those. I'd recommend students to study there as UNSW is one of the top university across Australia.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close