University of Calgary vs Ambrose University vs Mount Royal University - MRU vs Alberta University of the Arts - AUArts vs Prairie Bible Institute - Prairie Aviation Training Centre - PATC
Side-by-side comparison from 178 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and research opportunities
- +Dedicated and supportive professors
- +Flexible learning options and campus engagement
- +Supportive and personable staff/professors
- +Excellent campus facilities and environment
- +Engaging coursework and academic support
- +Supportive and inclusive community with strong professor-student relationships.
- +Engaging student life and extracurricular activities.
- +Small class sizes fostering connection and personalized support.
- +Access to diverse media and exploration of art practices
- +Exceptional academic and personal support from invested professors
- +Small class sizes and personalized instructor attention
- +Nurturing and accessible learning community
- +Opportunities for personal growth and interaction
- +Strong academic support and post-graduation advantage
- +Supportive instructors and engaging learning environment
- +Diverse and welcoming international student community
- +Valuable programs with practical experiences
- -Lack of course availability and competition for enrollment.
- -Poor teaching quality and administrative issues in academic departments.
- -University's lack of responsiveness to student concerns and issues of harassment/retaliation.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources frustrate students.
- -Some students find the curriculum and teaching methods unsatisfactory.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -A perceived lack of support from staff and faculty is frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support create feelings of neglect.
This institution garners strong scores across multiple facets, with Internationality standing out as a particular strength at 4.35. Facilities and Location also receive high marks, both above 4.2. Areas for potential improvement include Student Life, which is the lowest rated category at 3.99, closely followed by Accomodation at 3.92. Professors and Value achieve identical scores of 4.06.
Performance across surveyed categories reveals a well-rounded institution. Accommodation stands out as the strongest area, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, student life received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other areas such as professors, internationality, and value all received strong marks, suggesting a positive overall experience for students.
This institution receives commendation across several key areas. Facilities and professors stand out with the highest ratings, indicating strengths in these core educational components. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and location also show positive feedback, all scoring above 4.0. Value for money is also a notable strength, with a solid rating. The university presents a well-rounded offering, with its strongest aspects lying in its academic resources and teaching staff.
This university shows exceptional strength in its academic offerings, with professors receiving a near-perfect rating. Location is also a well-regarded aspect. Areas needing improvement include facilities and student life, which received the lowest scores. Accommodation and value for money are rated moderately well, alongside a decent internationality score.
This institution garners excellent marks across several key areas, particularly excelling in **Professors** and **Student Life**, both receiving a perfect score. **Value** also stands out with a top rating. The university demonstrates strong performance in **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, each earning a solid 4. Accommodations also received a good rating of 4.
This institution garners exceptional scores for its **Facilities**, achieving a near-perfect 4.83. **Professors** and **Location** also score highly, both at 4.5, alongside a strong showing in **Student Life** and **Internationality**. **Value** is another significant strength at 4.67. The only area receiving a comparatively lower rating is **Accomodation**, standing at 3.8.
~86% of 103 reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, research opportunities, and professor dedication. A small ~4% of negative feedback notes issues with course availability and underfunding in some programs.
With ~88% positive feedback, students praise personable professors, engaging coursework, excellent facilities, and a vibrant campus atmosphere. Some note that lectures rely heavily on PowerPoints. No negative reviews were recorded.
With 39 reviews averaging 4.38/5, ~92% are positive, praising community, small class sizes, and faculty support. No negative feedback was reported.
All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight access to diverse classes and instructors who are invested in personal growth and offer one-on-one support.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 rating. It highlights an amazing learning community, accessible professor-to-student ratio, and strong after-school advantages. There is no negative feedback.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 6 reviews, approximately 83% are highly positive. Students praise the friendly environment, diverse cultures, valuable programs, and supportive instructors, especially for international students. No negative feedback was recorded.
Months before I was due to graduate, I faced harassment from two Physics and Astronomy department heads due to having a disability. I submitted a harassment complaint and instead of resolving the situation, the dean of the science faculty, the vice provost student experience and vice provost EDI retaliated and I had to deal with assault from an associate dean. The math courses, physics courses and computer science courses I took were universally poorly taught, and poorly administered. There is no support for students with disabilities and those who are othered are treated harshly and unfairly.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show