British Columbia Institute of Technology - BCIT vs University of British Columbia vs Lighthouse Labs vs Canadian Tourism College - CTC vs LaSalle College Vancouver

Side-by-side comparison from 215 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
British Columbia Institute of Technology - BCIT: wins 0/5 categories
University of British Columbia: wins 1/5 categories
Lighthouse Labs: wins 0/5 categories
Canadian Tourism College - CTC: wins 0/5 categories
LaSalle College Vancouver: wins 1/5 categories
Acsenda School of Management: wins 2/5 categories
Columbia College - CC: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Arts
Vancouver, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Fashion Marketing and Communication
Best programme: International Management
Vancouver, Canada
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication
Category ratings
Facilities
3.40
4.22
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.50
4.00
Location
4.15
4.45
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.05
4.10
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.50
4.35
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
3.00
Student life
3.10
4.31
Not rated
Not rated
1.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Value
4.40
4.08
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.50
Win
4.00
Accommodation
3.55
3.86
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.50
4.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, hands-on learning and projects
  • +Industry-experienced instructors and real-world relevance
  • +Strong career outcomes and job placement
  • +Excellent professors and engaging courses
  • +Valuable career preparation and practical learning opportunities
  • +Abundant resources, study spaces, and campus support services

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Experienced faculty and supportive learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and equipment
  • +Commitment to diversity and inclusion
  • +Accessible, friendly, and helpful staff
  • +Relevant, applicable, and expert instruction from passionate professors
  • +Convenient downtown Vancouver location
  • +Practical learning and real-world application
  • +Resources and materials for engagement
  • +Passion development and field familiarity
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of engagement and support from instructors is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative & course selection issues are frustrating.
  • -Social life can feel superficial and exclusive.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality, with some professors subpar.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a significant concern.
  • -The teaching quality and course content often fall short of expectations.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -A lack of engaging teaching methods and clear communication is disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support for students is a common complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a strong performance in its international student experience, reflected by a high rating for Internationality. The location also receives a favorable score. Areas for potential improvement include student life and facilities, which received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like professors, accommodation, and overall value are rated positively.

This institution's surveyed areas reveal a mixed performance. The strongest aspects are Location, scoring 4.45, closely followed by Internationality at 4.35 and Student Life at 4.31. Facilities also received a commendable 4.22 rating. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.86, while Professors and Value fall within the mid-range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution garners particularly strong ratings in **Internationality (5)**, indicating a well-developed global presence. **Facilities** and **Location** also score highly at 4. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, rated only 1.5. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** all sit in the mid-range, with scores of 3.5, 3, and 3.5 respectively.

This institution garners exceptional marks in its **professors**, **location**, and **student life**, all receiving perfect scores. Its **internationality** and **value** are also highly commendable. Conversely, **facilities** and **accommodation** represent the areas with the most room for improvement, though still scoring respectably.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its academic offerings and campus environment. Professors and location both received perfect scores, indicating a highly regarded faculty and desirable setting. Student life, facilities, and accommodation are also strong points, scoring a solid 4 out of 5. The university's weakest area is its internationality, with a rating of 3, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and appealing option.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly all (95%+) of student reviews are positive, praising hands-on learning, industry-experienced instructors, and strong career outcomes. No negative feedback was reported.

With 4.23/5 stars from 191 reviews, approximately 74% of feedback is positive, highlighting strong academics, professors, and resources. Negative feedback, representing about 1.1%, mentions course selection difficulties and inconsistent professor quality.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5 based on two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight experienced faculty and modern facilities as key strengths. No negative feedback was recorded.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 100% of feedback being 4–5 stars. Students highlight friendly and helpful staff, as well as professors' passion and relevant teaching.

The sole review is highly positive (100%), awarding 5/5 stars. Students praise opportunities to explore passions and access to resources for real-life practice.

Rating distribution
5★
43%
38%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
4★
52%
50%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
5%
12%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Underwhelming

I was there as an exchange student from Europe, attending classes at Sauder Business School and the Mechanical Engineering Department. Studying at UBC is definitely a mixed bag in terms of the quality of education. I did have a few great professors who held wonderfully challenging and well-thought-out classes, making me feel that UBC punches above its weight in terms of educational quality. However, some other lectures were undoubtedly subpar. Grading seemed quite arbitrary at times (moving goalposts seems to be a recurring theme at UBC), and the lectures were not nearly as good as they should have been, in my opinion. It is quite fair to say that other exchange students and I were often shocked that UBC allows these courses to occur annually without making efforts to improve them. At UBC as a whole, less is expected from students than at my home university. I've seen people never show up to class and hold presentations that would never fly at my home uni. Professors seems to welcome all questions even if they are about things a fourth-year engineering student just months before graduation needs to know. I am not sure if UBC ensures that its graduates are adequately educated, and would definitely think twice if I was a recruiter and had to hire someone who attented there. From what I have seen, I would tentatively recommend Sauder Business School. For Mechanical Engineering (and probably also Electrical and Civil Engineering), UBC is simply too small, offering a lack of choices and not many lectures; usually, only introductory courses are offered for most topics. I recommend attending a more engineering/science-focused university, such as Waterloo or others in the US or Europe. It is quite astonishing how much money people pay to attend these subpar classes. Enjoyed having a beach on campus.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close