Johan Cruyff Institute vs Maastricht University - UM vs Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs Rotterdam School of Management - RSM vs ONCAMPUS Global
Side-by-side comparison from 173 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Specialized sports management content and expert professors
- +Valuable industry connections and networking opportunities
- +Welcoming atmosphere and excellent staff support
- +Engaging Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and small-group learning
- +International and intercultural environment with diverse classmates
- +Supportive and welcoming community with approachable professors
- +Strong theory-practice balance and real-world application
- +High-quality, challenging, and expert-led education
- +Diverse community and international opportunities
- +Broad business curriculum with specialization options
- +High-quality teaching from expert faculty
- +International environment and extensive networking opportunities
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
- +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
- +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
- +Exceptional professors and engaging teaching
- +Valued friendships and strong community
- +Emphasis on empathy and ethical leadership
- -Poor quality of instruction and unengaging student discussions.
- -Ineffective project management and lack of professional experience among peers.
- -Strict and high failing rates with unforgiving study advice policies.
- -Problem-based learning (PBL) is disappointing and overly demanding.
- -Poor organization and a lack of adequate support for students.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Communication and course organization are often cited as lacking.
- -Large class sizes prevent professor interaction.
- -Lack of personal attention and feeling like a number.
- -Pre-recorded online lectures offer limited engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources are a significant concern.
- -The administrative and management systems are perceived as inefficient and unsupportive.
- -Communication and transparency from the institution are consistently lacking.
Across several key areas, the institution receives commendable ratings. Its strongest performances are noted in Value and Internationality, both achieving near-perfect scores. Professors also garnered exceptionally high marks. The weakest area is Location, which, while still positive, is rated lower than other aspects. Student Life, Accomodation, and Facilities all fall within a strong middle range.
This university receives strong marks for its **Internationality** (4.41) and **Value** (4.32). **Facilities** also rate highly at 4.24. Student life and professors are also well-regarded, scoring above 4.0. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 2.98. Location also scores below average at 3.89.
This institution received its highest marks for Internationality, closely followed by Value and Professors. Student Life also scored well. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest area, with Facilities also rating lower than other aspects. Location sits in the mid-range of these assessments.
This institution garners excellent marks for its Internationality, achieving a perfect score. Location and Facilities are also standout strengths, both rated above 4.7. Student Life and Professors receive solid scores in the mid-4s. Value is also rated well. The lowest score is for Accomodation, which sits at 3.875, indicating this area could be improved compared to other aspects.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.
This institution presents a strong overall profile, excelling particularly in **Value** with a rating of 4.33. Facilities, Professors, and Student Life also received favorable scores of 4. The university's weakest area appears to be its **Location**, rated at 3.33. Accomodation and Internationality received solid mid-range scores, indicating good but not outstanding performance in these aspects.
University students largely praise the insightful sports management content, quality professors, and valuable networking opportunities, with a ~96% positive sentiment. A small fraction of feedback (~4%) mentions issues with academic support variability or program depth.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising the international atmosphere, Problem-Based Learning (PBL), and supportive community. A small percentage (~7.7%) express concerns about PBL's effectiveness and organization.
~88% of reviews are highly positive, praising the quality of education, practical application, and international environment. No negative feedback was received.
With ~92% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.25/5, students praise interesting courses, strong faculty support, and a positive impact focus. Some dissatisfaction exists with large class sizes and limited professor interaction.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, ~67% are positive. Students praise exceptional professors and the development of strong friendships, emphasizing empathy in business education. No negative feedback was provided.
A perfect synergy between theoretical knowledge, practical application, and high-quality networking. After completing the Master in Sport Management at Johan Cruyff Institute, I took a major step forward in my career in the sports industry. What truly sets this institution apart is the closeness and support of the professors and staff, as well as the enriching experiences shared with fellow students. Without a doubt, it has been one of the most transformative decisions of my life.
One of the most advertised features of the university, it is very pressuring and does not deliver the promised results - everything still has to be learned in the same manner as everywhere else - but here no tutorials are to be missed and PBL is supposed to be a key to successful graduation. Doing twice the work, therefore dividing the attention and time resources, without other options for students struggling with this method - then you are on your own.
As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.
Erasmus university especially RSM is known as one of the best business school in Europe. IBA is a great program for anyone would like to study business. The curriculum cover broad topics in business area with a possibility to choose your specialization. Also there are a lot of opportunities to participate in exchange, internship, or minor in other faculties. I would recommend this program for anyone interested in business study.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
