London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Cass Business School vs Greenwich Business School vs London Academy of Trading - LAT

Side-by-side comparison from 362 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Global Banking School (5.00)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 1/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 3/7 categories
Cass Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Greenwich Business School: wins 0/7 categories
London Academy of Trading - LAT: wins 0/7 categories
The Event School London: wins 0/7 categories
Global Banking School: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
London, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Event Management
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Tourism Business
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.44
Win
4.33
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.78
Win
4.74
4.44
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.26
4.75
4.40
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.80
4.60
4.30
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
3.65
4.56
Win
4.33
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.05
4.50
4.50
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.80
4.32
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and convenient location
  • +Strong academic and personal development support
  • +Engaging professors and effective teaching methods
  • +Diverse student body and valuable networking opportunities
  • +Strong career services and diverse program specializations
  • +Engaging and supportive faculty.
  • +Comprehensive and industry-relevant course content.
  • +Excellent facilities and student life.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse teaching styles from various tutors
  • +Flexibility and adaptability fostered by module changes
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
  • -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
  • -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication and transparency are frequently lacking.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible or irrelevant course content is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Inefficient administrative and communication processes.
  • -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant teaching.
Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

This university garners excellent reviews across most aspects. Its strongest areas are clearly **Location** and **Value**, both scoring a high 4.44 and 4.5 respectively. Professors and student life also receive very positive marks. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which, while still good, sits at a 4.0, slightly below the other categories. Internationality and Facilities are also well-regarded.

This institution demonstrates strong performance, particularly in its Location and Internationality, both scoring an excellent 4.5. Student Life, Facilities, and Professors also receive commendably high marks at 4.25. Accomodation stands out as a slightly less strong area with a rating of 4, while Value also scores highly at 4.5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its teaching staff and international student experience, both receiving top marks. Its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are also highly regarded, all scoring a solid four out of five. While value for money is also rated at a perfect five, the professors and internationality stand out as the university's most impressive attributes.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 10 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, engaging teaching, and valuable career opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.

University reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), with students highlighting helpful teachers and insightful modules. The student experience is described as memorable and well-supported. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This suggests overwhelmingly positive feedback, with approximately 0% negative sentiment. The reviewer appreciated the flexibility offered by having different tutors per module.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
75%
60%
50%
0%
0%
100%
4★
44%
25%
30%
25%
0%
0%
0%
3★
18%
0%
10%
25%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close